This biomechanical study compared suture anchors versus transosseous sutures for repair of quadriceps tendon ruptures using a force of 150 N at a frequency of 0.5 Hz. No significant difference in displacement was found between the 2 techniques with initial loading or with load or no load after 1000 cycles. Displacement after 1000 cycles for suture anchors and bone tunnels was 4.65 and 4.50 mm, respectively. These findings suggest a possible role for suture anchors in repairing quadriceps tendon ruptures. Suture anchors are relatively expensive but require less dissection over the patella and do not involve suture placement about the patella tendon.
Using a dynamic biomechanical model of malunion of the shoulder, we have determined the change in deltoid force required for abduction with various combinations of superior and posterior displacement of fractures of the greater tuberosity of the humerus. We tested eight fresh human cadaver shoulders in a dynamic shoulder-testing apparatus during cycles of glenohumeral abduction from 0° to 90°. The greater tuberosities were osteotomised and stabilised to represent malunion with combinations of superior and posterior displacements of 1 cm and less. The peak force was measured for each displacement in each specimen and statistically compared with values of no displacement using a repeated-measures analysis of variance. The abduction force was significantly increased by 16% (p = 0.006) and 27% (p = 0.0001) by superior displacements of 0.5 cm and 1 cm, respectively, while combined superior and posterior displacement of 1 cm gave an increase in force of 29% (p = 0.001). While treatment criteria for acceptable residual displacement of the greater tuberosity are widely used, there is little information on the direct biomechanical effects of displacement on shoulder mechanics. Although the results of conservative treatment are influenced by a number of factors, including associated injuries, rehabilitation and the pre-existing function of the shoulder, our data suggest that small amounts of residual displacement may alter the balance of forces required to elevate the arm at the glenohumeral joint.
Using a dynamic biomechanical model of malunion of the shoulder, we have determined the change in deltoid force required for abduction with various combinations of superior and posterior displacement of fractures of the greater tuberosity of the humerus. We tested eight fresh human cadaver shoulders in a dynamic shoulder-testing apparatus during cycles of glenohumeral abduction from 0 degrees to 90 degrees. The greater tuberosities were osteotomised and stabilised to represent malunion with combinations of superior and posterior displacements of 1 cm and less. The peak force was measured for each displacement in each specimen and statistically compared with values of no displacement using a repeated-measures analysis of variance. The abduction force was significantly increased by 16% (p = 0.006) and 27% (p = 0.0001) by superior displacements of 0.5 cm and 1 cm, respectively, while combined superior and posterior displacement of 1 cm gave an increase in force of 29% (p = 0.001). While treatment criteria for acceptable residual displacement of the greater tuberosity are widely used, there is little information on the direct biomechanical effects of displacement on shoulder mechanics. Although the results of conservative treatment are influenced by a number of factors, including associated injuries, rehabilitation and the pre-existing function of the shoulder, our data suggest that small amounts of residual displacement may alter the balance of forces required to elevate the arm at the glenohumeral joint.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.