Objective. To determine rates of cervical cancer screening and associated abnormal results in women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).Methods. We identified women with an initial diagnosis of SLE in the MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database from 2001 to 2014. Cervical cancer screening rates and associated diagnostic claims within 3 years of the initial claim were determined. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to evaluate the association of screening with lupus treatment. A matched logistic regression analysis was conducted to compare screening rates to those in age-matched women without connective tissue disease.Results. We included 4,316 women with SLE. Screening rates were higher in women with SLE than in general controls (73.4% versus 58.5%; P < 0.001). Factors associated with decreased screening included recent time (odds ratio [OR] 0.70 [95% confidence interval (95% CI)] 0.55-0.89) (2012-2014 compared to 2001-2005), age ≥61 years (OR 0.27 [95% CI 0.18-0.39]), comorbidity score ≥2 (OR 0.71 [95% CI 0.6-0.83]), corticosteroid use (OR 0.77 [95% CI 0.61-0.97]), and use of immunosuppressants (OR 0.80 [95% CI 0.69-0.94]). Abnormal pathology result claims were more common in women with SLE than in general controls (12.3% versus 9.8%; P < 0.001).Conclusion. Though with higher rates than the general cohort, over 25% of the patients with SLE were not screened, and screening rates seem to be decreasing over time. Patients with SLE are at higher risk of abnormal cervical screening test results than controls, supporting the need for regular screening.

Objective Prospective long‐term observational studies (LOS) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) lack a core set of universally collected outcome measures, particularly patient‐centered outcomes, precluding accurate comparisons across studies. Our aim was to identify long‐term outcome measures collected and reported in these studies. Methods We conducted a systematic review of registries and LOS of patients with RA, searching in ClinicalTrials.gov, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Registry of Patient Registries, and Google Scholar. The names and acronyms of registries and LOS were further searched in the Medline and Embase databases to retrieve published articles. Two independent reviewers undertook data collection, quality appraisal, and data extraction. Results We identified 88 registries/LOS that met our eligibility criteria. These were divided into 2 groups: disease‐based (52 [59%]) and therapy‐based (36 [41%]). Methodologic and reporting standards varied across the eligible studies. For clinical outcomes, disease activity was recorded in 88 (100%) of all LOS/registries. The most commonly reported measure (86 [98%]) was the composite outcome Disease Activity Score using 28 joints. Of the patient‐centered outcomes collected, physical functioning was most frequently reported (75 [85%]) with the Health Assessment Questionnaire (75 [85%]) as the most commonly used instrument within this domain. Other domains of patient‐centered outcomes were comparatively infrequently recorded: mental (29 [33%]), social (20 [23%]), and health‐related quality of life (37 [42%]). Conclusion Most registries/LOS collect measures of disease activity and physical function. However, there is substantial heterogeneity in the collection of relevant patient‐centered outcomes that measure symptom burden and mental and social ramifications of RA.

Objective.This is an update from the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Core Outcomes in Longterm Observational Studies Special Interest Group with a focus on rheumatoid arthritis.Methods.Preliminary data and proposed next steps were outlined and discussed by participants.Results.Domains identified after initial steps (systematic review and qualitative research) were pain, physical functioning, participation (i.e., work, social), longterm symptoms, fertility/family planning, emotional well-being, coping, financial status, and adverse events including death.Conclusion.The group agreed conceptually that short-term core outcomes could be different from longer term ones. Participants emphasized the importance of analyzing the need for core domains specifically for longterm longitudinal observational studies.

Necrobiotic xanthogranuloma (NXG) is a rare systemic and progressive granulomatous disease first described in 1980. Given no established first-line therapy, treatment focuses on the control of skin lesions and associated complications. Despite it being a granulomatous disease, NXG has not been associated with hypercalcemia. About 140 cases of NXG have been reported to date but, to our knowledge, this is the first case to be complicated by hypercalcemia. Our case confirms a granulomatous disease-mediated production of 1α-hydroxylase leading to increased synthesis of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D and subsequent hypercalcemia. Based on this pathophysiology, we elected to start systemic glucocorticoids, titrated to clinical and metabolic response. Steroid-sparing agents need to be considered to avoid long-term complications but continue controlling this granulomatous disease. © 2017 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Background:Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease that carries an increased risk for both viral illnesses and malignancies, including a greater risk for both human papilloma virus (HPV) infection and cervical cancer. Due to this increased risk, the American Society of Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology guidelines for SLE patients recommend more frequent cervical cancer screening. Few studies have examined patient characteristics associated with decreased cervical cancer screening in patients with autoimmune disease, specifically SLE.Objectives:To estimate cervical cancer screening rates in women with recently diagnosed SLE, and to identify characteristics associated with decreased screening.Methods:We identified women with an initial diagnosis of SLE in the United States MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounter (CCAE, age 18-64) administrative claims database. We included patients with at least three claims with a lupus diagnosis (first and last at least >90 days apart), no lupus claims within the year before initial claim, and who had been on antimalarial drugs for at least 90 days. We excluded all patients with a previous claim for hysterectomy.Cervical cancer screening was ascertained using diagnosis and procedure codes within 1 year before and 2 years after the first SLE claim. Our covariates included the year of first SLE claim (2001-2014), age at first SLE claim, comorbidity score, insurance type, geographical region, and prescriptions for multiple types of corticosteroids. Control patients included age-matched females without autoimmune disease. Univariate comparison and multivariate logistic regression models were built to evaluate determinants of screening.Results:We included 4,316 SLE patients (median age 45) and 86,544 control patients. The screening rate in SLE patients was 73.4% vs 58.5% in the controls (P < 0.001). The screening rate was 71% in 2001, increased to 75% in 2004, then decreased to 70% in 2014 (trend P =0.005). In the multivariate model the following factors were associated with decreased cervical cancer screening: year of first SLE claim 2012-2014 versus 2001-2005 (odds ratio (OR) 0.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53 – 0.84, P < 0.001); older age 61-64 versus 21-30 (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.19 – 0.39, P < 0.001); comorbidity score of ≥2 versus <2 (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.6 – 0.83, P < 0.001); and use of corticosteroids for ≥ 90 days versus <90 days (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.59 – 0.9, P = 0.003). Insurance type and geographical region were not associated with cervical cancer screening.Conclusion:About three quarters of women with SLE underwent cervical cancer screening within 3 years of their first lupus claim, at higher rates than controls. However, there was a concerning downward trend in screening rates in recent years. In addition, higher risk populations for cervical cancer (older age, increased comorbidities, and longer duration of corticosteroids) had lower screening rates. These findings highlight the need to enhance education for healthcare providers to improve utilization of screening in women with SLE at high risk of cervical cancer.Disclosure of Interests:Sebastian Bruera: None declared, Richard Zogala: None declared, Xiudong Lei: None declared, Xerxes Pundole: None declared, Hui Zhao: None declared, Sharon Giordano: None declared, Jessica Hwang Grant/research support from: MERCK grant funding unrelated to SLE., Maria Suarez-Almazor: None declared