This article discusses the importance of trained police officers, School Resource Officers (SROs), participating in school-based crisis response efforts. These efforts, mostly preventative in nature, mitigate and de-escalate trauma for students exposed to a wide variety of challenging situations. Scenarios are presented with dialogue between students and SRO, offering insights into how SROs support students' emotional needs. The article demonstrates how trained SROs' service complements schoolbased crisis prevention and intervention efforts. Keywords crisis intervention team, mental health, School Resource Officer, student support including School Resource Officers in school-based crisis interventionStrengthening student support An essential underlying condition for learning, school safety is paramount in the minds of parents, teachers, and school administrators (Cornell & Mayer, 2010).

No abstract

This article reviews published models for crisis intervention to identify common tasks. Two categories of tasks were identified, continuous and focused. Continuous tasks (assessment, safety, and support) are those that are addressed throughout the entire intervention process. Mental health counselors (MHCs) must attend to these at all times when assisting clients in crisis. Focused tasks (contact, re-establishing control, defining the problem, and follow-up) are time-encapsulated: once a task is accomplished, MHCs can move on to another. However, given the chaotic nature of crises, MHCs may have to return to these at points during the intervention.

The authors implemented a small, A‐B‐A single‐case research design (n = 3) to evaluate the effectiveness of a cognitive behavior counseling intervention for offenders with mental illness who were incarcerated in a large correctional facility. Visual and nonoverlap analyses revealed that the intervention was within the effective to very effective range for decreasing psychiatric symptoms for 2 of the participants; 1 participant showed little change throughout treatment. Implications for program development and evaluation are discussed.

IntroductionPeople who are homeless or vulnerably housed are subject to disproportionately high risks of physical and mental illness and are further disadvantaged by difficulties in access to services. Research has been conducted examining a wide range of issues in relation to end-of-life care for homeless and vulnerably housed people, however, a contemporary scoping review of this literature is lacking.ObjectivesTo understand the provision of palliative care for people who are homeless or vulnerably housed from the perspective of, and for the benefit of, all those who should be involved in its provision.DesignScoping review with thematic synthesis of qualitative and quantitative literature.Data sourcesMEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Social Policy and Practice and CINAHL databases were searched, from inception to May 2020. Citation chasing and manual searching of grey literature were also employed.ResultsSixty-four studies, involving 2117 homeless and vulnerably housed people were included, with wide variation in methodology, population and perspective. The thematic synthesis identified three themes around: experiences, beliefs and wishes; relationships; and end-of-life care.ConclusionDiscussion highlighted gaps in the evidence base, especially around people experiencing different types of homelessness. Existing evidence advocates for service providers to offer needs-based and non-judgemental care, for organisations to use existing assets in co-producing services, and for researchers to address gaps in the evidence base, and to work with providers in transforming existing knowledge into evaluable action.