We present a translation from programs expressed in a functional IR into dataflow networks as an intermediate step within a Haskellto-Hardware compiler. Our networks exploit pipeline parallelism, particularly across multiple tail-recursive calls, via non-strict function evaluation. To handle the long-latency memory operations common to our target applications, we employ a latency-insensitive methodology that ensures arbitrary delays do not change the functionality of the circuit. We present empirical results comparing our networks against their strict counterparts, showing that nonstrictness can mitigate small increases in memory latency and improve overall performance by up to 2×.

Abstraction in hardware description languages stalled at the register-transfer level decades ago, yet few alternatives have had much success, in part because they provide only modest gains in expressivity. We propose to make a much larger jump: a compiler that synthesizes hardware from behavioral functional specifications. Our compiler translates general Haskell programs into a restricted intermediate representation before applying a series of semantics-preserving transformations, concluding with a simple syntax-directed translation to SystemVerilog. Here, we present the overall framework for this compiler, focusing on the intermediate representations involved and our method for translating general recursive functions into equivalent hardware. We conclude with experimental results that depict the performance and resource usage of the circuitry generated with our compiler.

We present a technique for implementing dataflow networks as compositional hardware circuits. We first define an abstract dataflow model with unbounded buffers that supports data-dependent blocks (mux, demux, and nondeterministic merge); we then show how to faithfully implement such networks with bounded buffers and handshaking.Handshaking admits compositionality: our circuits can be connected with or without buffers, and combinational cycles arise only from a completely unbuffered cycle. While bounding buffer sizes can cause the system to deadlock prematurely, the system is guaranteed to produce the same, correct, data before then. Thus, unless the system deadlocks, inserting or removing buffers only affects its performance. We demonstrate how this enables design space to be explored. CCS Concepts: • Theory of computation → Streaming models; • Hardware → Hardware description languages and compilation; • Computing methodologies → Parallel programming languages;

We present a technique for implementing dataflow networks as compositional hardware circuits. We first define an abstract dataflow model with unbounded buffers that supports data-dependent blocks (mux, demux, and nondeterministic merge); we then show how to faithfully implement such networks with bounded buffers and handshaking. Handshaking admits compositionality: our circuits can be connected with or without buffers, and combinational cycles arise only from a completely unbuffered cycle. While bounding buffer sizes can cause the system to deadlock prematurely, the system is guaranteed to produce the same, correct, data before then. Thus, unless the system deadlocks, inserting or removing buffers only affects its performance. We demonstrate how this enables design space to be explored.

No abstract