Cough is a predominant feature of respiratory infection and, in tuberculosis, is of prime importance for transmitting infection. Tuberculosis is transmitted by the air, yet the process by which bacilli are aerosolized has received little attention. Features of cough may account for differences in transmission rates from source cases of pulmonary disease. We review the literature on the mechanisms and characteristics of cough in tuberculosis in the context of the dissemination of infection. Coughing is probably more important than other respiratory maneuvers, and characteristics of mucus may have an important role but data are scarce. Direct mechanisms of cough in tuberculosis are unknown, as are temporal and other patterns that correlate with the release of viable airborne bacilli. Other than antituberculous chemotherapy and masks, there are few methods of modulating cough in tuberculosis. This is an increasingly important area for research.
Functional brain imaging in individuals with chronic cough demonstrates reduced activation in cortical regions associated with voluntary cough suppression. Little is known about the ability of patients with chronic cough to suppress cough. This study aimed to compare the ability to voluntarily suppress cough during inhaled capsaicin challenge in participants with chronic refractory cough with that in healthy controls. In addition, this study aimed to assess the repeatability of capsaicin challenge test with voluntary cough suppression.Participants with chronic refractory cough and healthy controls underwent inhaled capsaicin challenge tests while attempting to suppress their cough responses. After 5 days, either a conventional capsaicin challenge test with no cough suppression attempt, or a repeat test with an attempt at cough suppression was performed. Threshold capsaicin concentrations required to elicit one, two and five coughs were calculated by interpolation. Objective 24-h cough frequency was measured in individuals with chronic refractory cough.Healthy controls were able to suppress capsaicin-evoked cough while participants with chronic refractory cough were not. Geometric mean±sd capsaicin dose thresholds for five coughs with (CS5) and without (C5) suppression attempts were 254.40±3.78 versus 45.89±3.95 µmol·L−1, respectively, in healthy controls (p=0.033) and 3.34±5.04 versus 3.86±5.13 µmol·L−1, respectively, in participants with chronic refractory cough (p=0.922). Capsaicin dose thresholds for triggering five coughs with self-attempted cough suppression were significantly lower in participants with chronic refractory cough than in healthy controls; geometric mean±sd 4.94±4.43 versus 261.10±4.34 µmol·L−1, respectively; mean difference (95% CI) 5.72 (4.54–6.91) doubling doses (p<0.001). Repeatability of cough suppression test in both patients and healthy controls was high; intraclass correlation coefficients of log(CS5) values 0.81 and 0.87, respectively. CS5 was associated with objective cough frequency (ρ=−0.514, p=0.029).Participants with chronic refractory cough were less able to voluntarily suppress capsaicin-evoked cough compared to healthy controls. This may have important implications for the pathophysiology and treatment of chronic cough.
The transmission of tuberculosis is complex. Necessary factors include a source case with respiratory disease that has developed sufficiently for Mycobacterium tuberculosis to be present in the airways. Viable bacilli must then be released as an aerosol via the respiratory tract of the source case. This is presumed to occur predominantly by coughing but may also happen by other means. Airborne bacilli must be capable of surviving in the external environment before inhalation into a new potential host—steps influenced by ambient conditions and crowding and by M. tuberculosis itself. Innate and adaptive host defenses will then influence whether new infection results; a process that is difficult to study owing to a paucity of animal models and an inability to measure infection directly. This review offers an overview of these steps and highlights the many gaps in knowledge that remain.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.