Studies in humans suggest that stronger incentive motivational responses to Pavlovian food cues may drive over-consumption leading to and maintaining obesity, particularly in susceptible individuals. However, whether this enhanced incentive motivation emerges as a consequence of obesity or rather precedes obesity is unknown. Moreover, while human imaging studies have provided important information about differences in striatal responsiveness between susceptible and non-susceptible individuals, the neural mechanisms mediating these behavioral differences are unknown. The Nucleus Accumbens (NAc) mediates cue-triggered reward seeking and activity in the NAc is enhanced in obesity-susceptible populations. Therefore here, we used selectively-bred obesity-prone and obesity-resistant rats to examine intrinsic differences in incentive motivation, and the role of NAc AMPARs in the expression of these behaviors prior to obesity. We found that obesity-prone rats exhibit robust cue-triggered food-seeking (Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer, PIT). Using intra-NAc infusion of AMPAR antagonists, we show that this behavior is selectively mediated by CP-AMPARs in the NAc core. Additionally, biochemical data suggest that this is due in part to experience-induced increases in CP-AMPAR surface expression in the NAc of obesity-prone rats. In contrast, in obesity-resistant rats PIT was weak and unreliable and training did not increase NAc AMPAR surface expression. Collectively, these data show that food cues acquire greater incentive motivational control in obesity-susceptible populations prior to the development of obesity. This provides support to the idea that enhanced intrinsic incentive motivation may be a contributing factor, rather than a consequence of obesity. In addition, these data demonstrate a novel role for experience-induced up-regulation of NAc CP-AMPARs in PIT, pointing to potential mechanistic parallels between the processes leading to addiction and to obesity.

When discrete localizable stimuli are used during appetitive Pavlovian conditioning, "sign-tracking" and "goal-tracking" responses emerge. Sign-tracking is observed when conditioned responding is directed toward the CS, whereas goal-tracking manifests as responding directed to the site of expected reward delivery. These behaviors seem to rely on distinct, though overlapping neural circuitries, and, possibly, distinct psychological processes as well, and are thought to be related to addiction vulnerability. One currently popular view is that sign-tracking reflects an incentive motivational process, whereas goal-tracking reflects the influence of more top-down cognitive processes. To test these ideas, we used illness-induced outcome-devaluation and Kamin blocking procedures to determine whether these behaviors rely on similar or distinct underlying associative mechanisms. In Experiments 1 and 2 we showed that outcome-devaluation reduced sign-tracking responses, demonstrating that sign-tracking is controlled by reward expectancies. We also observed that post-CS goal-tracking in these animals is also devaluation sensitive. To test whether these two types of behaviors rely on similar or different prediction error mechanisms, we next tested whether Kamin blocking effects could be observed across these two classes of behaviors. In Experiment 3 we asked if sign-tracking to a lever CS could block the development of goal-tracking to a tone CS; whereas in Experiment 4, we examined whether goal-tracking to a tone CS could block sign-tracking to a lever CS. In both experiments blocking effects were observed suggesting that both sign- and goal-tracking emerge via a common prediction error mechanism. Collectively, the studies reported here suggest that the psychological mechanisms mediating sign- and goal-tracking are more similar than is commonly acknowledged.

Urges to consume food can be driven by stimuli in the environment that are associated with previous food experience. Identifying adaptations within brain reward circuits that facilitate cue-induced food seeking is critical for understanding and preventing the overconsumption of food and subsequent weight gain. Utilizing electrophysiological, biochemical, and DiI labeling, we examined functional and structural changes in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) and prefrontal cortex (PFC) associated with time-dependent increases in food craving ('incubation of craving'). Rats self-administered 60% high fat or chow 45 mg pellets and were then tested for incubation of craving either 1 or 30 days after training. High fat was chosen for comparison to determine whether palatability differentially affected incubation and/or plasticity. Rats showed robust incubation of craving for both food rewards, although responding for cues previously associated with high fat was greater than chow at both 1 and 30 days. In addition, previous experience with high-fat consumption reduced dendritic spine density in the PFC at both time points. In contrast, incubation was associated with an increase in NAc spine density and α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor (AMPAR)-mediated transmission at 30 days in both groups. Finally, incubation of craving for chow and high fat was accompanied by an increase in calcium-permeable and calcium-impermeable AMPARs, respectively. Our results suggest that incubation of food craving alters brain reward circuitry and macronutrient composition specifically induces cortical changes in a way that may facilitate maladaptive food-seeking behaviors.

Three experiments with male and female rats were conducted to examine the effects of Pavlovian extinction training on Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer (PIT) in a task in which the unconditioned stimulus (US) was presented at an early time point within an extended conditioned stimulus (CS). Two instrumental responses were trained with different reinforcing outcomes (R1-O1, R2-O2) and then, independently, two stimuli were trained with those outcomes (S1-O1, S2-O2). One group then underwent an extinction treatment (S1-, S2-) and a second was merely exposed to the experimental contexts without any stimulus events. Finally, the effects of the two stimuli on instrumental responding were assessed in PIT tests. Across experiments we varied the number of Pavlovian training trials prior to extinction (8, 16, or 64 trials) and the length of time following extinction prior to test (i.e., 1 or 21 days, in a test for spontaneous recovery). We observed that outcome-specific PIT was reduced by extinction in all of our training conditions and that this extinction effect was durable, surviving a 3-week spontaneous recovery interval even though conditioned magazine approach spontaneously recovered over this interval. While extinction reduced the magnitude of PIT, the temporal expression of PIT was mostly unaffected. We found these effects in both male and female rats, though in one study females were extinction-resistant. These data suggest that under the conditions studied here Pavlovian extinction may permanently weaken the ability of Pavlovian cues to retrieve a representation of their associated outcomes without impacting the temporal organization of responding. This suggests that different features of learning may be differentially sensitive to extinction.