Gas labyrinth seals (LS) restrict secondary flows (leakage) in turbomachinery and their impact on the efficiency and rotordynamic stability of high-pressure compressors and steam turbines can hardly be overstated. Among seal types, the interlocking labyrinth seal (ILS), having teeth on both the rotor and the stator, is able to reduce leakage up to 30% compared to other LSs with either all teeth on the rotor (TOR) or all teeth on the stator. This paper introduces a revamped facility to test gas seals for their rotordynamic performance and presents measurements of the leakage and cavity pressures in a five teeth ILS. The seal with overall length/diameter L/D = 0.3 and small tip clearance Cr/D = 0.00133 is supplied with air at T = 298 K and increasing inlet pressure Pin = 0.3–1.3 MPa, while the exit pressure/inlet pressure ratio PR = Pout/Pin is set to range from 0.3 to 0.8. The rotor speed varies from null to 10 krpm (79 m/s max. surface speed). During the tests, instrumentation records the seal mass flow (m˙) and static pressure in each cavity. In parallel, a bulk-flow model (BFM) and a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis predict the flow field and deliver the same performance characteristics, namely leakage and cavity pressures. Both measurements and predictions agree closely (within 5%) and demonstrate that the seal mass flow rate is independent of rotor speed. A modified flow factor Φ¯=m˙T/(PinD1−PR2) characterizes best the seal mass flow with a unique magnitude for all pressure conditions, Pin and PR.

No abstract

Gas labyrinth seals (LSs) improve turbomachinery operational efficiency and mechanical reliability by reducing secondary leakage. As interlocking labyrinth seals (ILSs) restrict more leakage than conventional see-through LSs, attention is due to their performance. An earlier paper [1] details the performance of a particular ILS in an ad-hoc test rig via measurements of mass flow (leakage) and cavity pressures while supplied with pressurized air at ambient temperature and operating with a rotor speed to a maximum of 10 krpm (surface speed 79 m/s). The test seal comprises of two teeth on the rotor and three teeth on the stator to make a four cavity seal with radial clearance Cr = 0.2 mm. The experimental and numerical leakages for the ILS produce a modified flow factor (Φ¯) that is independent of the seal operating conditions, namely inlet pressure, discharge pressure and rotor speed. The finding leads to an orifice-like loss coefficient cd = 0.36 and an effective clearance (cd × Cr) for the test seal, thus evidencing its effectiveness in reducing leakage. To complement the former research, this paper reports measurements of the leakage and cavity pressures for the same geometry interlocking labyrinth seals configured with two other clearances Cr = 0.3 mm and 0.13 mm. For the ILS with Cr = 0.3 mm, a first configuration is without a swirl brake (baseline), the second is with a swirl brake with 0° teeth pitch (axial ribs), and the third configuration is with a swirl brake with teeth angled at 40° in the direction of shaft rotation. For tests conducted without shaft rotation and with rotor spinning at 7.5 krpm (surface speed = 59 m/s), the inlet air pressure (Pin) ranges from 0.29 MPa to 0.98 MPa, while the exit pressure (Pout) is set to pressure ratios PR = (Pout/Pin) = 0.3, 0.5, 0.8. As to the ILS with Cr = 0.13 mm, it operates with an upstream swirl brake with axial ribs (0° teeth pitch) and w/o rotor speed. The supply pressure (Pin) varies from 0.59 MPa to 1.4 MPa and PR = 0.3, 0.5. The measurements and bulk-flow model predictions show that the seal mass leakage is proportional to the inlet pressure (Pin), increases as PR decreases, and is not affected by either shaft speed or the swirl brake configuration. Seal cavity static pressures drop linearly for all inlet pressures (Pin) and PR = 0.5 and above; except under a choked flow condition at PR = 0.3. Processing of the test data to consolidate the numerous leakage measurements delivers a nearly invariant flow factor Φ¯ for each seal clearance, and from this follows a unique orifice-like loss coefficient cd = 0.36 for the ILS with Cr = 0.3 mm, and cd = 0.33 for the ILS with Cr = 0.13 mm. This finding is remarkable as the test results obtained for the ILS with Cr = 0.2 mm also deliver a similar loss coefficient (cd = 0.36). Finally, predictions of ILS leakage and cavity pressures are within 5% of the measurements for all test conditions. The test data and predictions are of significant value to better the selection and design of gas labyrinth seals in turbomachinery.