Human recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), filgrastim (Neupogen; Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA), has been widely used for the mobilization of CD34(+) hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) from healthy donors. The experience with biosimilar G-CSF agents in this area is limited. We performed a prospective study assessing Tevagrastim (biosimilar filgrastim, XMO2; Teva, Israel) for mobilization of CD34(+) peripheral blood HSC in HLA-matched healthy sibling donors for transplantation in 24 patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) and high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) (NCT01542944). Results were compared to a historical control group of sibling donors who received filgrastim for stem cell mobilization for allogeneic stem cell transplantations in patients with AML and MDS. The healthy donors received Tevagrastim or filgrastim in a dose of 10 μg/kg body weight (BW) subcutaneously for 4 days. The target yields of CD34(+) cells was 5 × 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg BW of the recipient. A median 10.2 × 10(6) (range, 2.52 to 35.4) and 9.35 × 10(6) (range, 3.7 to 30.6) CD34(+) cells per kg BW were collected in the Tevagrastim and filgrastim groups, respectively. All patients promptly engrafted with a median day of absolute neutrophil count (ANC) of >.5 × 10(9)/L and >1 × 10(9)/L of 13 days (range, 10 to 21) and 13.5 days (range, 10 to 22), respectively in the Tevagrastim group and 12 days (range, 10 to 18) and 13 days (range, 10 to 18) in the filgrastim group, respectively. Platelets reached counts of >20 × 10(9)/L and >50 × 10(9)/L within a median of 14 days (range, 11 to 33) and 17 days (range, 12 to 33) in the Tevagrastim group and 13 (range, 10 to 29) and 15 (range, 10 to 32) days in the filgrastim group, respectively. The donors developed only mild and transient side effects, which were not different between the Tevagrastim study group and the filgrastim historical control group. Similarly, the transplantation-related toxicities and outcomes did not differ between the patients who underwent transplantation with Tevagrastim-mobilized grafts and the filgrastim historical controls. In summary, we observed a similar yield of CD34(+) stem cell mobilization in the Tevagrastim study group and the filgrastim historical control group with similar engraftment kinetic, hematopoietic reconstitution, and transplantation outcome. Tevagrastim administration was safe with minimal side effects and toxicity not different than historical controls. The lack of significant differences for all parameters of stem cell collection, engraftment, and safety with the biosimilar XMO2 Tevagrastim demonstrate the "similarity" of the biosimilar and recombinant human G-CSF in this indication.

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is the standard therapy for refractory/relapsed aggressive lymphoma. The initial step of the procedure involves mobilization and collection of hematopoietic stem cells. G-CSF fails to achieve mobilization in 15-25% of lymphoma patients. Plerixafor is a novel CXCR4 antagonist that can promote mobilization. It has been used successfully in patients after the failure of G-CSF. It is reasonable to test whether plerixafor should become the mobilizing agent of choice in patients expected to exhibit difficulties in mobilization. We initiated a study to assess the use of plerixafor as a first-line stem cell mobilizer in 20 elderly or heavily pretreated patients with non-Hodgkin or Hodgkin lymphoma. The minimum defined CD34+ cell dose of ≥2 × 10⁶ cells/kg was achieved by 90% of the patients, and for 83% of them with one apheresis procedure. The target CD34+ dose of ≥5 × 10⁶ cells/kg was achieved by 70% of the patients. The median number of circulating CD34+ cells before and after plerixafor was 14.4 and 42.8 cells/μl, respectively. The post-plerixafor adverse events were mild. All patients promptly engrafted after high-dose chemotherapy treatment. We conclude that plerixafor administration is safe and efficient for upfront mobilization in lymphoma patients predicted to be poor mobilizers.

Adoptive cell transfer represents an important mode of cancer immunotherapy and posttransplant associated viral infections. This technique involves massive volume reduction, as the procedure starts with large-scale ex vivo expansion of lymphocyte cultures (volume up to 60 L), which are harvested at the end of the in vitro process and terminates in a small volume to be infused into the patient. Toward this end, we develop a novel efficient process based on the COBE Spectra apheresis machine usually used for apheresis process. As the COBE Spectra cell separator is easy to use and often available at medical centers, this novel technique is applicable to many transplant and cell processing centers. Our results show a high recovery yield (98%+/-15%) and viability (ranged 79% to 99%) of the large-scale expanded lymphocytes. It preserves sterility of the product and is therefore suitable for immunotherapy treatments.

No abstract