Background: The objective of this study was to determine the required concentration of egg white (EW) in the diet to induce oral desensitization and/or immune tolerance within 4 weeks of oral immunotherapy (OIT) in an EW allergic mouse model. Methods: Female BALB/c mice were systemically sensitized to EW by intraperitoneal injections and subsequently subjected to oral allergen gavage. Sensitized mice were provided 4 weeks of OIT by supplementing with 0 (non-OIT), 0.01, 0.1, or 1% EW in a 20% casein diet. Nonsensitized mice served as the nonallergy group. We performed oral and intraperitoneal EW challenges, assessed vascular permeability in the dorsal skin, and measured allergic biomarkers. Results: The change in rectal temperature after oral challenge was not significantly different between the nonallergy and 1% EW groups, and the frequency of diarrhea in the 1% EW group was lower than that in the non-OIT group. The levels of plasma ovomucoid-specific IgE, IgA, and IgG2a in the 1% EW group at the study endpoint were significantly lower than those in the non-OIT group. IFN-γ and IL-10 secretions of spleen lymphocytes in the 1% EW group were significantly higher than those in the non-OIT group, and the percentage of CD4+Foxp3+ cells in the 1% EW group was higher than that in the non-OIT group. Conclusion: These results suggested that diet supplemented with 1% EW can induce oral desensitization and immune tolerance in the EW allergic mouse model.

We examined whether the stepwise oral immunotherapy (OIT) for 10 days ameliorates the severity of allergy and the biomarkers in an allergy mouse model. The OIT could not protect anaphylaxis symptoms after allergen challenges but promote the production of antibodies, especially allergen-specific IgA. It was suggested that this OIT influenced the function of immuno response against the allergen. Abbreviations: EW: egg white; IFC: intraperitoneal food challenge; IFN-γ: interferon-γ; IL: interleukin; OVA: ovalbumin; OM: ovomucoid; OFC: oral food challenge; OIT: oral immunotherapy.

Effectiveness of retinoic acid (RA) in treating food allergy is not yet clear. Using an allergic mouse model, we examined the amelioration of the severity of food allergy by daily RA intake with allergen or without. Female Balb/c mice were systemically sensitized to egg white (EW) and alum by intraperitoneal injection. Sensitized mice were provided diets supplemented with 0% (non-treated group), 0.1% EW (allergen group), 0.0017% RA (RA group), or 0.1% EW plus 0.0017% RA (RA1allergen group) with 20% casein for 4 wk. Oral food challenge (OFC) and allergic biomarkers were quantified. The decrease in rectal temperature post-OFC was significantly suppressed in the RA and RA1allergen groups compared to those in the non-treated and allergen groups, respectivety. The plasma levels of ovalbumin-specific IgE, IgA and IgG1 at the study endpoint were higher in the allergen and RA1allergen groups than those in the non-treated and RA1allergen groups, respectivety. Plasma ovalbumin-specific IgG2a levels at the study endpoint were significantly higher in the RA1allergen group than those in the RA groups. The supernatant concentrations of interleukin-10 and interferon-g in the cultured spleen lymphocytes were highest in the RA1allergen group compared to those in the other groups. Thus, continuous intake of RA under allergen exposure ameliorated the severity of food allergy in a mouse model with food allergy.

No abstract

Background: Commercial spray-dried egg white (S-EW) is often used for oral immunotherapy (OIT). Peptifine® (PF), a commercial preparation of enzymatically-hydrolyzed egg white (EW) peptides, is considered safe OIT food.Objective: Here, we examined the therapeutic effect of PF or S-EW in a mouse model of EW allergy.Methods: Sensitized female BALB/c mice underwent 4-week OIT by supplementation of 19% casein diet with 1% PF (PF group) or S-EW (S-EW group), and non-supplementation of 20% casein diet (non-OIT group). Non-sensitized mice acted as the non-allergy group. Oral and intraperitoneal EW challenges were performed and allergic biomarkers were determined.Results: Changes in rectal temperature after oral challenge were comparable in the allergy groups. However, after intraperitoneal challenge, rectal temperature decrease in the PF and S-EW groups was lower than in the non-OIT group. After 4 weeks, plasma levels of ovalbumin-and ovomucoid-specific antibodies were assessed; IgE levels in the PF and S-EW groups were lower than those in the non-OIT group. Interleukin-4 secretion after EW challenge was significantly lower in splenocyte cultures derived from PF and S-EW groups than in the non-OIT group. Furthermore, the percentage of CD4 + Foxp3 + splenocytes in the PF group was significantly higher than that in the non-OIT and S-EW groups. Oral gavage of 40 mg PF did not induce an allergic response in sensitized mice with EW. Conclusion:Diet supplementation with 1% PF mildly ameliorated the severity of allergy in mouse with EW allergy, indicating that PF is a safe OIT food.