This study aims to analyze the legality of the electronic certificate of mortgage in the context of executing the guarantee if the debtor defaults or defaults if there is a data error in the bank credit agreement. The method used in this research is the literature method with reference to the normative juridical method, namely using data sourced from secondary legal materials, namely from the prevailing laws and regulations in Indonesia. The regulations used as material are the Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning / Head of the National Land Agency of the Republic of Indonesia Number 3 of 2019 concerning Electronically Integrated Mortgage Services. The research results show that the certificate generated from the electronic mortgage registration system has executorial power because the mortgage certificate contains the sentence for Justice Based on the One Godhead. The sentence shows that the mortgage certificate can be used as a tool for executing collateral if the debtor defaults or defaults to pay without a court order. Sentences for Justice based on the One Godhead are equated as a judge's decision in a court. If there is a data error in the certificate and no changes are made, the execution cannot be carried out and the certificate can be canceled and the agreement in guarantee can also be canceled.

In every activity that is an agreement, of course, there is an agreement that has been made. Whether it is in business, or in certain special matters.  This study aims to find out and analyze the regulation of cooperation agreement letters in the civil code (hyperdata). As well as knowing and analyzing the Principles and Determining Factors in Making a Draft Contract (Cooperation Agreement). This research belongs to the normative type of research. So it can be known that agreements are specifically regulated in the Civil Code, Book III, Chapter II on "Agreements Born of Contracts or Agreements" and Chapter V to Chapter XVIII which regulates the principles of legal principles and legal norms of treaties in general, as well as legal norms of treaties that have special characteristics better known as named agreements. In addition, basically, the contract that the parties conclude applies as a law to those who make it. The factors that must be considered by the parties are the legal authority of the parties, taxation, over legal rights, agricultural issues, choice of law, dispute resolution, termination of contracts, and the form of standard agreements agreed upon.

The definition of a grant is contained in Article 1666 of the Penal Code, which is an agreement by which a grantor gives up an item free of charge, without being able to withdraw it, for the benefit of a person who accepts the delivery of the goods. This study aims to find out and analyze about giving grants to someone who is not an heir. As well as knowing and analyzing about dispute resolution about granting grants to someone who is not an heir. This research belongs to the normative type of research. So it can be seen that the granting of a grant to a person who is not an heir is permissible, with the requirement that there is the consent of the heirs and cannot be more than 1/3 of the existing estate. In addition, the settlement of disputes regarding the granting of grants to a person who is not the heir is the heir may sue again for the grant if in the grant the grant exceeds 1/3 of the estate, other than because it does not first fulfill the legitime portie to the heirs.

Background: Law enforcement is one of the efforts to create order, security, and peace in the community, especially enforcement after violations of the law.   Objective: This study aims to find out and analyze the strengthening of evidence through scientific crime investigation in homicide crimes. As well as knowing and analyzing the advantages and disadvantages of using the scientific crime investigation method in crime scene processing carried out by the forensic laboratory.   Methods: This research belongs to the normative type of research. So that it can be known that the scientific crime investigation method is used in proving the crime of forensic murder.   Result: Article 184 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code has restrictively regulated valid evidence according to the law. Apart from the aforesaid evidence, it is not justifiable to be used to prove the wrongs committed by the accused. Judges, public prosecutors, defendants, and legal counsel, are limited and bound to use evidence by the rules of criminal procedure only. Evidence using evidence other than the evidence provided in Article 184 paragraph (1) has no binding evidentiary force value.   Conclusion: Based on the explanation above, it can be concluded that the scientific crime investigation method is used in proving the crime of forensic murder

Background: Indonesia is a country of law, the statement contained in the Explanation of the 1945 Constitution states that "The State of Indonesia is based on the law (rechtstaat) not based on mere power (machtstaat)".   Objective: This study aims to find out and analyze the implementation of article 170 paragraph (2) 1 of the Criminal Code concerning criminal acts with joint energy committing violence against people. As well as knowing and analyzing the liability of criminal acts of mobbing in criminal law   Methods: This research belongs to the normative type of research. So that it can be known that the liability of the criminal act of mobbing according to criminal law depends on the category of mobbing itself (Article 170 of the Criminal Code).   Result: If the act is committed overtly and with concerted force using force against persons or goods is punished with imprisonment for not more than five years and six months, and if it results in injuries is subject to a maximum sentence of seven years. Burglary if violence results in serious injury are punishable by a maximum of nine years imprisonment. If violence results in death are subject to a maximum of twelve years.   Conclusion: Based on the above explanation, it can be concluded that the liability of the criminal act of mobbing according to criminal law depends on the category of mobbing itself (Article 170 of the Criminal Code).