No abstract

To investigate the frequency, epidemiology, clinical features, and prognostic significance of inflamed molluscum contagiosum (MC) lesions, molluscum dermatitis, reactive papular eruptions resembling Gianotti-Crosti syndrome, and atopic dermatitis in patients with MC. Design: Retrospective medical chart review. Setting: University-based pediatric dermatology practice. Patients: A total of 696 patients (mean age, 5.5 years) with molluscum. Main Outcome Measures: Frequencies, characteristics, and associated features of inflammatory reactions to MC in patients with and without atopic dermatitis. Results: Molluscum dermatitis, inflamed MC lesions, and Gianotti-Crosti syndrome-like reactions (GCLRs) occurred in 270 (38.8%), 155 (22.3%), and 34 (4.9%) of the patients, respectively. A total of 259 patients (37.2%) had a history of atopic dermatitis. Individuals with atopic dermatitis had higher numbers of MC lesions (P Ͻ .001) and an increased likelihood of molluscum dermatitis (50.6% vs 31.8%; P Ͻ.001). In patients with molluscum dermatitis, numbers of MC lesions increased during the next 3 months in 23.4% of those treated with a topical corticosteroid and 33.3% of those not treated with a topical corticosteroid, compared with 16.8% of patients without dermatitis. Patients with inflamed MC lesions were less likely to have an increased number of MC lesions over the next 3 months than patients without inflamed MC lesions or dermatitis (5.2% vs 18.4%; P Ͻ.03). The GCLRs were associated with inflamed MC lesion (PϽ .001), favored the elbows and knees, tended to be pruritic, and often heralded resolution of MC. Two patients developed unilateral laterothoracic exanthemlike eruptions. Conclusions: Inflammatory reactions to MC, including the previously underrecognized GCLR, are common. Treatment of molluscum dermatitis can reduce spread of MC via autoinoculation from scratching, whereas inflamed MC lesions and GCLRs reflect cell-mediated immune responses that may lead to viral clearance.

Amelanotic melanoma can have a varied appearance both clinically and microscopically. Here, we present our experiences with 75 cases of amelanotic melanoma defined clinically as a non-pigmented lesion and histopathologically as a tumor lacking significant melanization. We evaluated microscopic features such as morphology, mitotic count, nuclear atypia and presence of solar elastosis. Our amelanotic melanomas exhibited the following morphology: epitheloid (72%), spindled (18.7%) or desmoplastic (5.3%). In addition, we obtained patient information and clinical presentations on most of the cases (74/75; 98.7%) and follow-up data on 40% (30/75) of the cases. The majority of amelanotic melanomas in men were found on the trunk (13/45; 29%), head and neck (12/45; 26.7%), and lower limb (13/45; 29%) and in women were found on the lower limb (12/30; 40%), upper limb (10/30; 33.3%) and head and neck (6/30; 20%). In addition, we found that an increase in mitotic index correlated with worse survival (p < 0.026), whereas there were no differences in survival for other pathological features, such as nuclear atypia or solar elastosis. Furthermore, in cases with available tissue, all amelanotic melanoma expressed microphthalmia-associated transcription factor and tyrosinase, suggesting that the tumor cells retained melanocytic lineage and an enzyme in melanin formation, respectively. As the occurrence of amelanotic melanoma and the expression melanoma markers were similar to pigmented melanoma, we favor that amelanotic melanoma represents a subtype of melanoma rather than poorly differentiated or de-differentiated melanoma.

No abstract

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC), a rare aggressive primary cutaneous neuroendocrine carcinoma, occurs on sun-damaged skin, especially in the elderly. Its unique co-expression of cytokeratin 20 (CK20) and neuroendocrine markers, including neuron-specific enolase (NSE), is diagnostic. Most MCCs are located in the dermis, rarely has an intraepidermal component been reported. We report a case of MCC with an intraepidermal component admixed with squamous cell carcinoma in situ (SCCIS). We were able to identify the differences in the immunohistochemical expression pattern between that of the intraepidermal and the dermal components. Most intraepidermal neoplastic cells of MCC in this case showed a less intense immunoreactivity to CK20 and NSE compared to that of dermal neoplastic cells. This case reports an unusual occurrence of combined SCC and MCC that shows both intraepidermal and dermal components.