ObjectiveSeveral inflammatory markers have been studied as potential biomarkers in renal cell carcinoma (RCC), however few reports have analyzed their prognostic value in aggregate and in non-clear cell histologies. We hypothesize that a combination of specific inflammatory markers into an RCC Inflammatory Score (RISK) could serve as a rigorous prognostic indicator of overall survival (OS) in patients with clear cell and non-clear cell RCC.MethodsCombination of preoperative C-reactive protein (CRP), albumin, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), corrected calcium, and aspartate transaminase to alanine transaminase (AST/ALT) ratio was used to develop RISK. RISK was developed using grid-search methodology, receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) analysis, and sensitivity-specificity trade-off analysis. Prognostic value of RISK was analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional regression models. Predictive accuracy was compared with RISK to Size, Size, Grade, and Necrosis (SSIGN) score, University of California-LOS Angeles (UCLA) Integrated Staging System (UISS), and Leibovich Prognosis Score (LPS).ResultsAmong 391 RCC patients treated with nephrectomy, area under the curve (AUC) for RISK was 0.783, which was comparable to SSIGN (AUC 0.776, p = 0.82) and UISS (AUC 0.809, p = 0.317). Among patients with localized disease, AUC for RISK and LPS was 0.742 and 0.706, respectively (p = 0.456). On multivariate analysis, we observed a step-wise statistically significant inverse relationship between increasing RISK group and OS (all p < 0.001).ConclusionRISK is an independent and significant predictor of OS for patients treated with nephrectomy for clear cell and non-clear cell RCC, with accuracy comparable to other histopathological prognostic tools.

Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown activity in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, the role of PD-1 expression in tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) as a biomarker for poor outcome is not clear. In this study, we evaluated the prognostic value of TIL PD-1 expression in patients with clear cell RCC (ccRCC). 82 patients who underwent nephrectomy for localized or metastatic ccRCC and followed up for at least four years were searched from our database and retrospectively enrolled. Their fixed primary tumor specimens were stained with anti-PD-1 (NAT105). The specimens were classified as negative or positive for PD-1 expression, and the positive specimens were further scored in 10% increments. 37 (45.12%) patients were negative (<1% stained), 26 (31.71%) patients were low (<10 and 10%), and 19 (23.17%) patients were high (20-50%) for PD-1 expression. The prognostic value of TIL PD-1 expression was evaluated by univariate Cox proportional hazards regression on overall and recurrence-free survivals. Higher TIL PD-1 expression was not associated with increased risk of death (P = 0.336) or with increased risk of recurrence (P = 0.572). Higher primary tumor stage was associated with increased risk of recurrence (P = 0.003), and higher Fuhrman nuclear grade was associated with increased risk of death (P <0.001) and with increased risk of recurrence (P <0.001). Our study shows that TIL PD-1 expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) does not correlate with poor clinical outcome in patients with ccRCC and is inferior to established prognosticating tools.

No abstract

No abstract

ObjectiveTo examine the prognostic value of tumor major histocompatibility complex I (MHCI) expression on survival and recurrence in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC).MethodsFifty-three patients that underwent nephrectomy at our institution for clear cell RCC (T1–T3) with ≥4 years of follow-up were queried from our nephrectomy database. Immunohistochemical staining for MHCI was performed on tumor specimens and MHCI expression was quantified with an automated image analysis technique. Patients were divided into high and low MHCI expression groups in order to study the relationship between MHCI expression and prognosis using the Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test.ResultsOverall survival and recurrence free survival were increased in the high MHCI expression group compared to the low MHCI expression group (log-rank, p = 0.036 and p = 0.028, respectively). Patients alive at the end of the study had higher MHCI expression (mean positivity score 0.82) than those that died of disease (mean positivity score 0.76, t test, p = 0.030). Patients that did not develop recurrence during the study period had higher MHCI expression (mean positivity score 0.83) than those that did develop recurrence (mean positivity score 0.78), but this difference was not significant (t test, p = 0.079).ConclusionOur data demonstrate that high MHCI expression confers improved overall and recurrence free survival in patients with clear cell RCC and could serve as an important prognostic tool in identifying high-risk patients.