SIGNIFICANCE:This study reports prevalence data combined independently for accommodative dysfunction, convergence insufficiency, visual field loss, and visual acuity loss in patients with traumatic brain injury in the absence of eye injury. OBJECTIVE:The objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the prevalence rates of accommodative dysfunction, convergence insufficiency, visual field loss, and visual acuity loss in TBI patients without concomitant eye injury.

SIGNIFICANCE:This study reports the prevalence and relative risk of photophobia in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI).OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the prevalence and relative risk of photophobia in patients with TBI.DATA SOURCES: Three databases were used for literature search: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library.STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: Publications reporting the prevalence of photophobia after TBI in patients of any age were included. A series of meta-regression analyses based on a generalized linear mixed model was performed to identify potential sources of heterogeneity in the prevalence estimates.RESULTS: Seventy-five eligible publications were identified. The prevalence of photophobia was 30.46% (95% confidence interval [CI], 20.05 to 40.88%) at 1 week after the injury. Prevalence decreased to 19.34% (95% CI, 10.40 to 28.27%) between 1 week and 1 month after TBI and to 13.51% (95% CI, 5.77 to 21.24%) between 1 and 3 months after the injury. The rapid decrease in the prevalence of photophobia in the first 3 months after a TBI injury was significant (P < .001). Three months post-TBI, the prevalence of photophobia leveled off to a near plateau with nonsignificant variability, increasing between 3 and 6 months (17.68%; 95% CI, 9.05 to 26.32%) and decreasing between 6 and 12 months since TBI (14.85%; 95% CI, 6.80 to 22.90%). Subgroup analysis of 14 publications that contained control data showed that the estimated risk ratio for photophobia was significantly higher in the TBI than in the control group during the entire 12 months after TBI. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF KEY FINDINGS:This study demonstrates that photophobia is a frequent complaint after TBI, which largely resolves for many individuals within 3 months after the injury. For some patients, however, photophobia can last up to 12 months and possibly longer. Developing an objective quantitative methodology for measuring photophobia, validating a dedicated photophobia questionnaire, and having a specific photophobia International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision code would greatly improve data gathering and analysis.

Introduction Brain injury often impacts the visual system. Diagnosis and treatment of visual system problems related to brain injury is a field with less settled science and more variation in practice than most specialty fields. Most optometric brain injury residency programs are in federal clinics (VA and DoD). A consensus core curriculum has been created that will allow some consistency while facilitating program strengths. Materials and Methods Kern’s curriculum development model and a focus group of subject matter experts were used to reach consensus in producing a core curriculum to provide a common framework for brain injury optometric residency programs. Results A common high-level curriculum was developed with educational goals through consensus. Conclusions In a relatively new subspeciality without a firm foundation of settled science, a common curriculum will help provide a common framework to facilitate clinical and research progress in this field. The process sought out expertise and community building to help improve the adoption of this curriculum. This core curriculum will provide a framework for educating optometric residents in the diagnosis, management, and rehabilitation of patients with visual sequelae because of brain injury. It is intended to ensure that appropriate topics are covered while allowing for flexibility according to each program’s strengths and resources.