SummaryWe compared the McGrath MAC â videolaryngoscope when used as both a direct and an indirect laryngoscope with a standard Macintosh laryngoscope in patients without predictors of a difficult tracheal intubation. We found higher median Intubation Difficulty , respectively (p = 0.01). This difficulty is in part explained by the poorer laryngeal views recorded using the Cormack and Lehane classification system (p < 0.001) and reflected in the higher than normal operator force required (25%, 4%, 8% for each method, respectively, p < 0.001) and the increased use of rigid intubation aids (21%, 6%, 2%, respectively, p < 0.001). There was no difference between the groups in time taken to intubate or incidence of complications. There was no statistical difference in the performances as measured between the McGrath MAC used as an indirect videolaryngoscope and the Macintosh laryngoscope. We cannot recommend that the McGrath videolaryngoscope be used as a direct laryngscopic device in place of the Macintosh.

The melolabial flap is a versatile technique for reconstruction of defects of the central face. Variations of this flap may be used to reconstruct the lower eyelids, the nose, the upper and lower lip, chin, and malar regions. Regional anatomy, indications, technical considerations, and avoidance of complications are discussed on the basis of 10 bilateral cadaver dissections of the melolabial area, in conjunction with 70 reconstructive cases that used this flap. Statistical analysis of the results reveals that flap viability is compromised by previous radiation and smoking. Consequently, alternate methods of reconstruction of the central face should be used in patients who have a history of these problems.

No abstract

No abstract

The deviated external nose remains a difficult technical challenge to even the most masterful rhinoplastic surgeon. The classic septorhinoplasty approach to the deviated nose demonstrated a 9.8% revision rate in this study. During a 2-year period, the conservative subtraction-addition rhinoplasty procedure was developed, which subsequently reduced the revision rate to 1.3%. Conservative subtraction-addition rhinoplasty foregoes aggressive septal surgery and equalizes and enhances the airway through asymmetric turbinate volume reduction. Minimal bony and upper lateral work through rasping, soft tissue removal, and/or cartilage grafting allows for external nasal alignment. Both internal and external conservative subtraction-addition rhinoplasty components thus maintain perioperative structural stability and ensure long-term nasal symmetry.