Objective Ozone therapy has tremendous therapeutic potential owing to its antiviral, anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties, and potential to improve oxygenation. A pilot clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravenous ozonised saline treatment in patients with moderate COVID-19 pneumonia. Patients and Methods 10 patients were administered 200 ml freshly prepared ozonised saline intravenously over 1 hour once a day for 8 days along with standard medical treatment. Clinical symptoms were monitored everyday and laboratory biomarkers, radiological findings at 1,3,6,10 days. Telephonic follow up was done for all after discharge till Day 14. 7 out of 10 patients required oxygen supplementation at recruitment. Results There was severe adverse event recorded in the study group. All patients improved from moderate to mild category in average 8 days and were discharged in average 9.7 days. None deteriorated to severe stage. All clinical symptoms resolved within 6 days and oxygen supplementation requirement reduced to none within 4.1 days. There was statistically significant reduction in CRP (p=0.003), D-Dimer (p=0.049), IL6 (p=0.002) and statistically significant improvement (p=0.001) in SpO2/FiO2 ratio. Change in LDH was borderline statistically not significant (p=0.058). All patients showed significant resolution of bilateral interstitial infiltrates at the end of 10 days. Conclusion Resolved clinical symptoms, improved oxygenation, clearance of infiltrates on Chest X-ray and improvement in biomarkers in a short period with non-progression of the disease showed that IV ozonised saline therapy was safe and effective to prevent disease progression in COVID-19, making it an effective novel therapeutic tool.

Pediatric neurological disorders represent a major part of the disabilities worldwide. In over 10 decades of research to find a cure for these disorders, medical science has not been able to repair the underlying brain injury. This chapter focuses on recent advances in the application of stem cells as a therapeutic tool for some of the common neurodevelopmental disorders (cerebral palsy, autism, intellectual disability and muscular dystrophy). The mechanism of action of stem cells in each disorder has been explained. A review of clinical data has been described giving a clear understanding of current status of stem cell therapy in these disorders. Various factors influencing the outcome of stem cell therapy such as different types of cells, different routes of administration and dosage and frequency of transplantation have also been discussed. Our experience of treating these disorders is exhibited in the form of our published data. Use of novel monitoring tools such as MRI MSK and PET-CT scan brain to track the changes occurring at cellular level after stem cell therapy are described. We also highlight the importance of a multidisciplinary approach of combining rehabilitation with stem cell therapy.

Background:Promising results from previous studies using cell therapy have paved the way for an innovative treatment option for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). There is considerable evidence of immune and inflammatory abnormalities in ALS. Bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMMNCs) possess immunomodulatory properties and could contribute to slowing of disease progression.Objective:Aim of our study was to evaluate the long-term effect of autologous BMMNCs combined with standard treatment on survival duration in a large population and to evaluate effect of type of onset and hormonal status on survival duration in the intervention group.Methods:This controlled, retrospective study spanned over 10 years, 5 months; included 216 patients with probable or definite ALS, 150 in intervention group receiving autologous BMMNCs and standard treatment, and 66 in control group receiving only standard treatment. The estimated survival duration of control group and intervention group was computed and compared using Kaplan Meier analysis. Survival duration of patients with different types of onset and hormonal status was compared within the intervention group.Results:None of the patients reported any major adverse events related to cell administration or the procedure. Kaplan Meier analysis estimated survival duration in the intervention group to be 91.7 months while 49.7 months in the control group (p = 0.008). Within the intervention group, estimated survival was significantly higher (p = 0.013) in patients with limb onset (102.3 months) vs. bulbar onset (49.9 months); premenopausal women (93.1 months) vs. postmenopausal women (57.6 months) (p = 0.002); and preandropausal men (153.7 months) vs. postandropausal males (56.5 months) (p = 0.006).Conclusion:Cell therapy using autologous BMMNCs along with standard treatment offers a promising and safe option for ALS with the potential of long term beneficial effect and increased survival. Limb onset patients, premenopausal women and men ≤ 40 years of age demonstrated better treatment efficacy.

No abstract