The data suggest that HHV8 is widespread in the Mediterranean area, including regions like Albania that have not been previously investigated. The statistically significant association between HHV8 seropositivitity and increasing age suggests that non-sexual transmission routes may be involved in the spread of the virus.
Experiencing HIV-related stigma has important impacts on the mental health of people living with HIV, which has implications for treatment adherence, disease progression, and health outcomes. The impacts of stigma are particularly important to consider among sexual and gender minorities, who often face a disproportionate burden of HIV. To address the implications of stigma in these key populations, we leveraged a longitudinal study conducted among Peruvian sexual and gender minorities to compare the relative effects of multiple mediators affecting the relationship between experienced HIV-related stigma and psychological distress: internalized HIV-related stigma, adaptive coping, and maladaptive coping. HIV-related stigma, coping, and distress were measured, respectively, at 24 weeks, 36 weeks, and 48 weeks post-diagnosis for 145 participants from the [BLINDED] study. HIV-related maladaptive coping largely mediated the relationship between experienced HIV-related stigma and distress. Our findings suggest interventions targeting maladaptive coping may alleviate the mental health consequences of experiencing HIV-related stigma.
Background
As the crisis-based approach to HIV care evolves to chronic disease management, supporting ongoing engagement with HIV care is increasingly important to achieve long-term treatment success. However, ‘engagement’ is a complex concept and ambiguous definitions limit its evaluation. To guide engagement evaluation and interventions to improve HIV outcomes, we sought to identify critical, measurable dimensions of engagement with HIV care for people on treatment from a health service-delivery perspective.
Methods
We used a pragmatic, iterative approach to develop a framework, combining insights gained from researcher experience, a narrative literature review, framework mapping, expert stakeholder input and a formal scoping review of engagement measures. These inputs helped to refine the inclusion and definition of critical elements of engagement behaviour that could be evaluated by the health system
Results
The final framework presents engagement with HIV care as a dynamic behaviour that people practice rather than an individual characteristic or permanent state, so that people can be variably engaged at different points in their treatment journey. Engagement with HIV care for those on treatment is represented by three measurable dimensions: ‘retention’ (interaction with health services), ‘adherence’ (pill-taking behaviour), and ‘active self-management’ (ownership and self-management of care). Engagement is the product of wider contextual, health system and personal factors, and engagement in all dimensions facilitates successful treatment outcomes, such as virologic suppression and good health. While retention and adherence together may lead to treatment success at a particular point, this framework hypothesises that active self-management sustains treatment success over time. Thus, evaluation of all three core dimensions is crucial to realise the individual, societal and public health benefits of antiretroviral treatment programmes.
Conclusions
This framework distils a complex concept into three core, measurable dimensions critical for the maintenance of engagement. It characterises elements that the system might assess to evaluate engagement more comprehensively at individual and programmatic levels, and suggests that active self-management is an important consideration to support lifelong optimal engagement. This framework could be helpful in practice to guide the development of more nuanced interventions that improve long-term treatment success and help maintain momentum in controlling a changing epidemic.
Background
Medication adherence is known to challenge treatment of HIV/AIDS and multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB). We hypothesized that electronic dose adherence monitoring (EDM) would identify an ART adherence threshold for emergent ART resistance and predict treatment outcomes in patients with MDR-TB and HIV on ART and bedaquiline-containing TB regimens.
Methods
A prospective cohort of adults with MDR-TB and HIV, on ART and initiating MDR-TB treatment with bedaquiline, were enrolled at a public TB referral hospital in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa (PRAXIS Study, Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03162107). Participants received separate EDM devices measuring adherence to bedaquiline and ART (nevirapine or lopinavir/ritonavir). Adherence was calculated cumulatively over six months. Participants were followed through completion of MDR-TB treatment. HIV genome sequencing was performed at baseline, 2 and 6 months on samples with HIV RNA ≥1000 copies/mL.
Findings
From November 2016 through February 2018, 198 MDR-TB and HIV co-infected participants were enrolled and followed (median 17.2 months, IQR 12.2 – 19.6). Eleven percent had baseline ART resistance mutations, and 7.5% developed emergent ART resistance at 6 months. ART adherence was independently associated with both emergent ART resistance and mortality. Modeling identified a significant (p<0.001), but linear association between ART adherence and emergent resistance, suggesting a strong association without a specific threshold.
Interpretation
Our findings highlight the need for ART resistance testing, especially in MDR-TB HIV co-infected patients, which is currently not standard of care in resource-limited settings. Despite short follow-up duration, reduced ART adherence was significantly associated with emergent resistance and increased mortality.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.