Peritoneal dialysis (PD) penetration in India remains low despite the huge chronic kidney disease burden and unmet need for renal replacement therapy (RRT). In order to understand the socioeconomic reasons that govern patients' preference for hemodialysis (HD), we carried out an opinion survey among prevalent in-center HD patients at our institution using a multiple response questionnaire that was verbally administered to them at the dialysis facility by the investigators. Close to 80% were self-financed and 49.5% were on twice weekly HD. Despite the majority (95%) receiving RRT education from a nephrologist, 43.4% were not aware of PD as an RRT modality. The treating nephrologist's recommendation was the most important reason given for choosing HD (77.8%) and not choosing PD (69.7%). Other reasons for not choosing PD included lack of a dedicated caregiver or "clean area" at home (15.1%), fear of infection (15.1%), disruption of work (14.1%), and the high cost of PD (7%). The perceived advantages of HD over PD were greater convenience because of need for only twice or thrice weekly sessions (61%), supervised care received in a hospital setting (28.8%), and less disruption of the patient's and family's routine (22%). We discuss the implications of these findings and what policy makers and nephrologists in India and other developing countries can do to improve PD penetration and utilization.

AimKidney biopsy (KBx) is the gold standard for evaluation of kidney disease, but is associated with a higher risk of complications in patients with reduced glomerular filtration rate (GFR). We studied the safety and utility of KBx in patients with eGFR <30 ml/min/1.73 m2.MethodsConsecutive adult patients with eGFR <30 ml/min/1.73 m2, who were planned for a KBx and consented to participate were prospectively enrolled. Patients with solitary/transplant kidney or acute kidney injury were excluded. Haemoglobin was checked on the day of KBx and repeated 18–24 h later along with a screening ultrasound. Post‐KBx complications were noted and their risk‐factors analysed. The utility of the KBx was graded as effecting significant, some, or no change to subsequent management.ResultsOf the 126 patients included, 75% were male, 27.7% were diabetic, and the median eGFR was 13.5 ml/min/1.73m2. Major complications occurred in 5.6%. Peri‐renal haematomas were detected in 37.3%, and haematomas ≥2 cm were significantly more frequent in those with eGFR <15 ml/min/1.73 m2 (29.2% vs. 13%, p = .032). Dialysis was a risk factor, while pre KBx blood transfusion, diabetes and higher serum albumin were protective against any complication. KBx was more likely to make a significant difference in management in those with eGFR 15–29 ml/min/1.73m2 (44.1% vs. 11.1%, p < .001). Increasing age, lower serum creatinine and albumin were independently associated with KBx utility.ConclusionKBx is relatively safe in severe kidney disease but its risk to benefit balance needs to be carefully considered when eGFR is <15 ml/min/1.73m2.

Introduction: Catheter-Related Blood Stream Infections (CRBSI) are an important complication of both non tunnelled and tunnelled haemodialysis catheters, but are often poorly reported for tunnelled haemodialysis-catheters. Aim: To assess the rate, aetiology, and outcomes of CRBSI in patients using a tunnelled catheter at 12-month and 18-month audits at the newly-opened haemodialysis unit having care bundle as a part of routine catheter care. Materials and Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study involving two audits of CRBSI risk (12-month and 18-month audit) was conducted by the dialysis unit doctors and nursing staff at Medanta Super-Specialty Private Hospital, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India. Centres for Disease Control (CDC) and prevention core intervention/care bundle for Blood Stream Infections (BSI) reduction were incorporated as a part of routine catheter care. The 12-month (May 2018 to April 2019) and 18-month (May 2018 to November 2019) internal clinical audit were evaluated to assess the impact of care bundle on incidence of CRBSIs. Kidney-Disease- Outcome Quality-Initiative (KDOQI)-2006-criteria was used to define CRBSI. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 19.0 software (IBM Corporation, New York, United States). Descriptive and dispersion statistical analysis was done for studied variables. Results: Total patients in 12-months audit with tunnelled haemodialysis catheter were 14 (7 male and 7 female) with median age 64 years and in 18-months audit patient with tunnelled haemodialysis catheter were 18 (11 male and 7 female) with median age 67.5 years. CRBSI incidence was 2.58 per 1000 catheter days at the end of 12-month, with 132 (71.25-202.25) days of median catheter use. Over the 18-month, the incidence of CRBSI dropped to 1.99 per 1000 catheter days. Median period of catheter use increased to 149.5 (83.5-294.5) days. The primary organisms isolated were predominantly gram negative bacterias. Conclusion: Tunnelled catheters may be a reasonable alternative vascular access for haemodialysis in patients with arteriovenous fistula failure as implementation and maintenance of multidisciplinary care bundle reduces CRBSI rate in such patients.