The purpose of this study is to examine the formulation of connectivity cases in Indonesian positive law and the implementation of judges' decisions on connectivity cases in the criminal justice system. The approach used in this research is a normative approach. The data collection technique used is conventional and online literature search. The data analysis method used in this research is qualitative because the data is presented in a descriptive-narrative way. The results showed that before the birth of the Criminal Procedure Code, a joint decision was made between the Minister of Justice, the Minister of Defense and Security, and the Attorney General, Joint Decree Number B/16/XII/1971 regarding wisdom in the examination of criminal acts carried out jointly by people who are included in the Criminal Procedure Code. military court environment. The basis for connectivity is contained in Article 22 of the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 14 of 1970 concerning the Basic Provisions of Judicial Power. The examination of connectivity in the Criminal Procedure Code is regulated in Chapter XI concerning Connectivity in Articles 89 to 94. In principle, all connectivity cases are examined and tried by a court in the general judiciary, except for the decision of the Minister of Defense and Security with the approval of the Minister of Justice, the case can be examined and tried by the court. in the military courts. However, in practice irregularities are often found, namely connectivity cases are resolved separately, meaning that general civilians are examined and tried by the general district court, while members of the military/armed forces are examined and tried by the military court.