The purpose of this study was to compare the quadriplegia index of function (QIF) to the functional independence measure (FIM) in assessing the daily performance of selfcare activities by individuals with cervical spinal cord injury. This study evaluated feeding, grooming and bathing activities in 22 C4-C7, Frankel A-D spinal cord injury patients between 3 and 12 months postinjury. The manual muscle test (MMT) was performed on 17 of these subjects during the same window of time as the QIF and the FIM. An upper extremity motor score (UEMS) was derived from the MMT. In order to relate motor power to functional ability, the UEMS was used as a measure of neurological function to test the hypothesis that the QIF scores are more highly correlated to motor power than are the FIM scores for this population. Spearman coefficients were calculated to correlate the QIF, the FIM and the UEMS. For the bathing and grooming categories, both the QIF and the FIM showed significant and similar correlations to the UEMS. For the feeding category, however, the QIF had a significantly better correlation to the UEMS than did the FIM (Rho = 0.90 vs 0.53, p < 0.01). Use of the QIF feeding scale may allow the detection of changes in function as individuals recover that the FIM scale would miss. Further evaluation of the remaining selfcare and mobility scales is needed. Modification of the FIM with more sensitive portions of the QIF would improve the discriminative ability of outcome studies and program evaluations.

Objectives: To present a function-based strategy for classifying patients by expected functional outcomes measured as patients' performances at discharge on each of the 18 component items of the FIM 2 instrument (previously known as the Functional Independence Measure). Methods: Data included records from 3604 inpatients with traumatic spinal cord injury discharged from 358 rehabilitation units or hospitals in 1995. The function-based strategy assigned patients to four Discharge Motor-FIM-Function Related Groups de®ned by patients' admission performance on the motor-FIM items. Results: The majority of patients whose motor-FIM scores at admission were above 30 were able to groom, dress the upper body, manage bladder function, use a wheelchair, and transfer from bed to chair, either independently or with supervision, by the time of discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. Most patients whose scores were above 52 attained independence in all but the most di cult FIM tasks, such as bathing, tub transfers, and stair climbing. Conclusions: This classi®cation scheme can be used to determine the degree to which patients' actual FIM outcomes compare to other individuals who had similar levels of disabilities at the time of admission to rehabilitation. The clinician can apply these`FIM item attainment benchmarks' retrospectively in quality improvement, in guideline development, and in anticipating the types of post-discharge care required by clinically similar groups.

No abstract

No abstract