The authors report findings of a study done to examine the use of nursing diagnosis by community health nurses (n= 15) and students (n= 20) who worked with population groups. Results of the analysis of the open‐ended questionnaires and student assignments indicate that many of the diagnoses, both wellness and deficit, could be classified in relation to the concepts present in published classification systems. Issues raised by the study about the use of nursing diagnosis with population groups include: incorporating wellness diagnoses in the NANDA Taxonomy, identifying when a group diagnosis is appropriate, determining whether to give priority to a behavioral or an environmental focus, and selecting the level of abstraction.

Conflicting views exist about the utility of nursing diagnosis in community health nursing, particularly in relation to its use with population groups. Until recently, this application of nursing diagnosis received limited consideration by the North American Nursing Diagnosis Association. As a result, discussion is needed regarding the ways in which use of nursing diagnosis with population groups in community settings may be different from the use of nursing diagnosis with individuals. In this article several distinctive characteristics of the use of nursing diagnosis for health promotion with various population groups are addressed. Thoughtful consideration of these distinctive characteristics can provide a foundation for effective use of nursing diagnosis with population groups in community settings.