Dome growth at the Soufriere Hills volcano (1996 to 1998) was frequently accompanied by repetitive cycles of earthquakes, ground deformation, degassing, and explosive eruptions. The cycles reflected unsteady conduit flow of volatile-charged magma resulting from gas exsolution, rheological stiffening, and pressurization. The cycles, over hours to days, initiated when degassed stiff magma retarded flow in the upper conduit. Conduit pressure built with gas exsolution, causing shallow seismicity and edifice inflation. Magma and gas were then expelled and the edifice deflated. The repeat time-scale is controlled by magma ascent rates, degassing, and microlite crystallization kinetics. Cyclic behavior allows short-term forecasting of timing, and of eruption style related to explosivity potential.
Eruption of the Soufri+re Hills Volcano on Montserrat allowed the detailed documentation of a Pel~an dome-forming eruption. Dome growth between November 1995 and March 1998 produced over 0.3km 3 of crystal-rich andesitic lava. Discharge rates gradually accelerated from < 1 m 3 s -1 during the first few months to >5 m 3 s -1 in the later stages. Early dome growth to September 1996 was dominated by the diffuse extrusion of large spines and mounds of blocky lava. A major dome collapse (17 September 1996) culminated in a magmatic explosive eruption, which unroofed the main conduit. Subsequent dome growth was dominated by the extrusion of broad lobes, here termed shear lobes. These lobes developed through a combination of exogenous and endogenous growth over many weeks, with movement accommodated along curved shear faults within the dome interior. Growth cycles were recognized, with each cycle initiated by the slow emplacement of a large shear lobe, constructing a steep flank on one sector of the dome. A growth spurt, heralded by the onset of intense hybrid seismicity, pushed the lobe rapidly out, triggering dome collapse. Extrusion of another lobe within the resulting collapse scar reconstructed the steep dome flanks prior to the next cycle.
On 25 June 1997, an unsteady, retrogressive, partial collapse of the lava dome at Soufrière Hills Volcano lasted 25 minutes and generated a major pulsatory block-and-ash flow, associated pyroclastic surges and a surge-derived pyroclastic flow that inundated an area of 4 km2 on the north and NE flanks of the volcano. Three main pulses are estimated to have involved 0.78, 2.36 and 2.36 x 106m3 of debris and the average velocities of the fronts of the related block-and-ash flow pulses were calculated to be 15 ms-1, 16.1 ms-1 and 21.9 ms-1 respectively.Deposits of block-and-ash flow pulses 1 and 2 partially filled the main drainage channel so that material of the third pulse spilled out of the channel at several places, inundating villages on the eastern coastal plain. Bends and constrictions in the main drainage channel, together with depositional filling of the channel, assisted detachment of pyroclastic surges from the pulsatory block-and-ash flow. The most extensive pyroclastic surge detached at an early stage from the third block-and-ash flow pulse, swept down the north flank of the volcano and then climbed 70 m in elevation before dissipating. Rapid sedimentation from this surge generated a high-concentration granular flow (surge-derived pyroclastic flow) that drained westwards into a valley not anticipated to be at high risk.Observations support the hypothesis that the interior of the Soufrière Hills Volcano lava dome was pressurized and that pyroclastic surge development became more substantial as deeper, more highly pressurized parts of the dome were incorporated into the pyroclastic flow. Surge development was at times so violent that expanded clouds detached from the block-and-ash flow within a few tens of metres of the lava dome.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.