No abstract

No abstract

Telepsychiatry could offer a viable medical service to remote or isolated social communities if it does not generate adverse reactions such as delusional ideation, particularly in patients in settlements without adequate exposure to mainstream culture and internet. We examined subjective reactions to telepsychiatry of randomly selected 84 psychiatric patients from remote locations in Ontario, Canada. They rated the quality of their teleconferencing sessions via 10 item questionnaire and were asked about advantages and disadvantages of telepsychiatry. The majority of patients indicated that they were able to communicate as if physically present (92.9%) and were comfortable with telepsychiatric service (95.2%). They found the sessions as beneficial as direct meetings with their psychiatrist (84.5%) and would use this service again (98.8%). There were no instances of telepsychiatry being associated with adverse reactions in patients from remote communities with inadequate exposure to modern mainstream culture and internet. ResultsThe majority (97.6%) of the patients rated the sound quality as good to excellent and 95.2% gave similar ratings to picture quality. Furthermore, 95.2% of the patients indicated by their ratings that they were comfortable with telepsychiatry service, 92.9% that they were able to communicate adequately, 84.5% of the patients found the sessions as beneficial as a direct physical presence, and 98.8% reported that they would use the service again.

Telepsychiatry could offer a viable medical service to remote or isolated social communities if it does not generate adverse reactions such as delusional ideation, particularly in patients in settlements without adequate exposure to mainstream culture and internet. We examined subjective reactions to telepsychiatry of randomly selected 84 psychiatric patients from remote locations in Ontario, Canada. They rated the quality of their teleconferencing sessions via 10 item questionnaire and were asked about advantages and disadvantages of telepsychiatry. The majority of patients indicated that they were able to communicate as if physically present (92.9%) and were comfortable with telepsychiatric service (95.2%). They found the sessions as beneficial as direct meetings with their psychiatrist (84.5%) and would use this service again (98.8%). There were no instances of telepsychiatry being associated with adverse reactions in patients from remote communities with inadequate exposure to modern mainstream culture and internet.

Background:Early intervention programs for psychosis are gateways for suicide prevention. These programs offer an excellent opportunity for prevention due to easy access, early identification, and provisions for continuity of care. These programs have been found effective in reducing rates of suicide after discharge to communities. The objective of this study was to examine suicide risk level among early psychosis patients admitted with and without previous suicide attempts. We hypothesized that all patients admitted with early psychosis would be at high risk of suicide, regardless of a previous suicide attempt.Methodology:Suicide risk was compared between patients admitted with a suicide attempt (n = 30) and patients admitted without a suicide attempt (n = 30). The primary outcome measure of interest was suicide risk which was measured with the Scale for Impact of Suicidality–Management, Assessment and Planning of Care clinical interview. All patients met DSM-IV TR criteria for schizophrenia. Psychopathology was assessed using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale and level of depression was assessed using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. The data were statistically analyzed.Results:Patients admitted with a previous attempt (mean = 29.5, standard deviation [SD] =12.0) did not differ significantly in suicide risk from those admitted without a previous attempt (mean = 27.5, SD = 12.5), (t[58] =0.63, P = 0.53). Patients admitted without a suicide attempt scored higher in depressive symptoms (t[58] =10.62, P < 0.001) than that of admitted with a suicide attempt. There were no significant differences between patients admitted with and without suicide attempts on any comorbidity, other than a trend toward a higher prevalence of personality disorder in patients with no suicide attempt. Attempters and nonattempters did not differ on any demographic variables either.Conclusions:Of those admitted without a previous suicide attempt, our findings suggest that it is critical that all patients discharged from an acute psychiatric unit must receive comprehensive community care. The identification of risk, and subsequent intervention for suicidal and self-harm behaviors, should be a central part of treatment for all mental disorders.