Uterine packing to control obstetrical hemorrhage has been generally discouraged over the past several decades. Intractable uterine hemorrhage postpartum or following an abortion is an extremely vexing management problem for the physician and continues to be a leading cause of maternal mortality. Uterine packing should be considered as a presurgical management tool after lacerations of the lower genital tract, uterine rupture, or retained products have been ruled out and when conventional therapy fails to control uterine hemorrhage. We describe two obstetrical patients with intractable uterine hemorrhage who were managed with uterine packing in combination with other methods of therapy. Causes of obstetrical hemorrhage and techniques of packing the uterus are discussed.

Acute appendicitis is the most common nonobstetrical surgical condition of the abdomen complicating pregnancy. Appendectomy reportedly is performed during pregnancy once for every 1,500 deliveries. Although the incidence of appendicitis occurring in pregnant women is considered to be the same as in nonpregnant women, the signs and symptoms, and the laboratory findings usually associated with appendicitis in the nonpregnant condition, are frequently unreliable during pregnancy. Using the Computer Diagnostic Data System, we completed a retrospective analysis on all appendectomies performed at two Army Medical Activities (MEDDACs) during a 2-year period. With a representative large Army MEDDAC and a representative medium-sized Army MEDDAC studied, the incidence of appendectomy during pregnancy was the same frequency as in previous reports. The only consistent finding in all pregnant patients who underwent appendectomy was right lower quadrant abdominal pain. Presenting signs and symptoms, clinical evaluations, laboratory findings, and surgical management is discussed. No morbidity or mortality occurred during this study.

Over the past 5 years, laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) has progressed from an experimental procedure to an alternative operation when abdominal hysterectomy is indicated. During a 15-month period, 31 patients underwent LAVH at Tripler Army Medical Center for treatment of gynecologic conditions that traditionally required abdominal hysterectomy. The benefits of the procedure and the complications encountered during surgery are discussed. A comparison of our data with data presented in other reports in the literature is considered favorable. While the complication rate was 16%, there was no mortality or serious morbidity. With experience and proper training of gynecologic surgeons, LAVH is an alternative to abdominal hysterectomy in selected cases.

Increasing emphasis has been placed on the training of obstetrics and gynecology residents in the evaluation of patients with breast disease. In the past, one had to refer to the surgery, radiology, or pathology literature to obtain current information on fine needle aspiration. With the present mandate to include breast disease in the academic curricula of obstetrics and gynecology residency training, the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tripler Army Medical Center, initiated training in breast evaluation. This preliminary report describes the Tripler Obstetrics and Gynecology Department Breast Evaluation Clinic and presents the findings of the first 40 patients.