SummaryDbf4-dependent kinases (DDKs) are required for the initiation of DNA replication, their essential targets being the MCM2-7 proteins. We show that, in Xenopus laevis egg extracts and human cells, hyper-phosphorylation of DNA-bound Mcm4, but not phosphorylation of Mcm2, correlates with DNA replication. These phosphorylations are differentially affected by the DDK inhibitors PHA-767491 and XL413. We show that DDK-dependent MCM phosphorylation is reversed by protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) targeted to chromatin by Rif1. Loss of Rif1 increased MCM phosphorylation and the rate of replication initiation and also compromised the ability of cells to block initiation when challenged with replication inhibitors. We also provide evidence that Rif1 can mediate MCM dephosphorylation at replication forks and that the stability of dephosphorylated replisomes strongly depends on Chk1 activity. We propose that both replication initiation and replisome stability depend on MCM phosphorylation, which is maintained by a balance of DDK-dependent phosphorylation and Rif1-mediated dephosphorylation.

The ability of a eukaryotic cell to precisely and accurately replicate its DNA is crucial to maintain genome stability. Here we describe our current understanding of the process by which origins are licensed for DNA replication and review recent work suggesting that fork stalling has exerted a strong selective pressure on the positioning of licensed origins. In light of this, we discuss the complex and disparate phenotypes observed in mouse models and humans patients that arise due to defects in replication licensing proteins.

The Methanocaldococcus jannaschii genome contains putative genes for all four nonoxidative pentose phosphate pathway enzymes. Open reading frame (ORF) MJ0960 is a member of the mipB/talC family of 'transaldolase-like' genes, so named because of their similarity to the well-characterized transaldolase B gene family. However, recently, it has been reported that both the mipB and the talC genes from Escherichia coli encode novel enzymes with fructose-6-phosphate aldolase activity, not transaldolase activity (Schürmann and Sprenger 2001). The same study reports that other members of the mipB/talC family appear to encode transaldolases. To confirm the function of MJ0960 and to clarify the presence of a nonoxidative pentose phosphate pathway in M. jannaschii, we have cloned ORF MJ0960 from M. jannaschii genomic DNA and purified the recombinant protein. MJ0960 encodes a transaldolase and displays no fructose-6-phosphate aldolase activity. It etained full activity for 4 h at 80 degrees C, and for 3 weeks at 25 degrees C. Methanocaldococcus jannaschii transaldolase has a maximal velocity (Vmax) of 1.0 +/- 0.2 micromol min(-1) mg(-1) at 25 degrees C, whereas Vmax = 12.0 +/- 0.5 micromol min(-1) mg(-1) at 50 degrees C. Apparent Michaelis constants at 50 degrees C were Km = 0.65 +/- 0.09 mM for fructose-6-phosphate and Km = 27.8 +/- 4.3 microM for erythrose-4-phosphate. When ribose-5-phosphate replaced erythrose-4-phosphate as an aldose acceptor, Vmax decreased twofold, whereas the Km was 150-fold higher. The molecular mass of the active enzyme is 271 +/- 27 kDa as estimated by gel filtration, whereas the predicted monomer size is 23.96 kDa, suggesting that the native form of the protein is probably a decamer. A readily available source of thermophilic pentose phosphate pathway enzymes including transaldolase may have direct application in enzymatic biohydrogen production.

Accurate replication of the genome requires the evolutionarily conserved minichromosome maintenance protein, Mcm10. Although the details of the precise role of Mcm10 in DNA replication are still debated, it interacts with the Mcm2-7 core helicase, the lagging strand polymerase, DNA polymerase-α and the replication clamp, proliferating cell nuclear antigen. Loss of these interactions caused by the depletion of Mcm10 leads to chromosome breakage and cell cycle checkpoint activation. However, whether Mcm10 has an active role in DNA damage prevention is unknown. Here, we present data that establish a novel role of the N-terminus of Mcm10 in resisting DNA damage. We show that Mcm10 interacts with the Mec3 subunit of the 9-1-1 clamp in response to replication stress evoked by UV irradiation or nucleotide shortage. We map the interaction domain with Mec3 within the N-terminal region of Mcm10 and demonstrate that its truncation causes UV light sensitivity. This sensitivity is not further enhanced by a deletion of MEC3, arguing that MCM10 and MEC3 operate in the same pathway. Since Rad53 phosphorylation in response to UV light appears to be normal in N-terminally truncated mcm10 mutants, we propose that Mcm10 may have a role in replication fork restart or DNA repair.

The accurate duplication of chromosomal DNA is required to maintain genomic integrity. However, from an evolutionary point of view, a low mutation rate during DNA replication is desirable. One way to strike the right balance between accuracy and limited mutagenesis is to use a DNA polymerase that lacks proofreading activity but contributes to DNA replication in a very restricted manner. DNA polymerase-␣ fits this purpose exactly, but little is known about its regulation at the replication fork. Minichromosome maintenance protein (Mcm) 10 regulates the stability of the catalytic subunit of pol-␣ in budding yeast and human cells. Cdc17, the catalytic subunit of pol-␣ in yeast, is rapidly degraded after depletion of Mcm10. Here we show that Ubc4 and Not4 are required for Cdc17 destabilization. Disruption of Cdc17 turnover resulted in sensitivity to hydroxyurea, suggesting that this pathway is important for DNA replication. Furthermore, overexpression of Cdc17 in ubc4 and not4 mutants caused slow growth and synthetic dosage lethality, respectively. Our data suggest that Cdc17 levels are very tightly regulated through the opposing forces of Ubc4 and Not4 (destabilization) and Mcm10 (stabilization). We conclude that regular turnover of Cdc17 via Ubc4 and Not4 is required for proper cell proliferation. INTRODUCTIONThe accurate duplication of the genome is crucial for the prolonged health of eukaryotic organisms. Inaccurate DNA replication and/or replication of any portion of the genome more than once can result in genomic instability, which is a consistently observed hallmark of cancer cells (Vaziri et al., 2003;Venkatesan et al., 2007). It is crucial, therefore, to understand the entire process of DNA replication. The initiation of DNA replication requires the coordinated recruitment of several proteins. Prereplicative complexes (Diffley et al., 1994), including the core helicase Mcm2-7 (Bochman and Schwacha, 2008), form at origins of replication, are converted to pre-initiation complexes (Zou and Stillman, 1998), and DNA is subsequently unwound (reviewed in Bell and Dutta, 2002). Once the DNA is unwound, the accuracy of DNA replication depends in large part upon DNA polymerases (pol)-␣, -␦, and -, all of which coordinate to synthesize the nascent copy of DNA during replication in eukaryotes (Burgers, 2009). Highlighting the importance of accurate DNA replication, 43% of mice homozygous for a proofreading-deficient allele of pol-␦ develop cancer, primarily lymphoma, but also squamous-cell carcinoma (Goldsby et al., 2001). Interestingly, pol-␣, the only enzyme that can synthesize DNA de novo, naturally lacks proofreading activity (Morrison et al., 1991). Unlike pol-␦, pol-␣ is foremost a replicative -and not a repair -polymerase (Wu et al., 2001;Wang et al., 2004). The lack of proofreading activity likely reflects one mechanism by which nature enforces evolution. However, this raises the question of how humans use a potentially mutagenic polymerase responsible for the initiation of more than 30 million Okazaki fragmen...