SummaryIn an attempt to reduce the incidence of pregnancy associated venous thromboembolism (PA-VTE), some researchers have advocated screening of all women for the factor VLeiden mutation during early pregnancy. We have conducted a large retrospective study (over 72,000 deliveries) to determine if this would be useful. Sixty-two objectively confirmed venous thrombotic events (51 DVT, 11 PE) were recorded at two maternity units in the UK. The incidence of DVT was 0.71 per 1000 deliveries (95% CI 0.5-0.9) with 0.50 occurring in the antenatal period (95% CI 0.34-0.66) and 0.21 in the puerperium (95% CI 0.11-0.31). The incidence of PE was 0.15 per 1000 deliveries (95% CI 0.06-0.24), 0.07 antenatal (95% CI 0.01-0.13) and 0.08 in the puerperium (95% CI 0.02-0.14). Of these 62,50 attended for follow-up and thrombophilia screening. 28% of all episodes of PA-VTE had no CIinical risk factor for thrombosis or an identifiable thrombophilic abnormality. Deficiency of antithrombin was identified in 12% of individuals (95% CI 3-21) and the factor VLeiden mutation in 8% (95% CI 0.5-15.5). Based on estimates of the prevalence of the factor VLeiden mutation in the population, we estimate that the thrombotic risk for a woman during pregnancy or the puerperium with the defect is approximately 1 in 400-500. This figure would not lend support to the idea of random screening for the mutation in early pregnancy.
In patients who have completed at least 3 months of anticoagulation for a first episode of unprovoked VTE and after approximately 2 years of follow-up, a negative D-dimer result was associated with a 3.5% annual risk for recurrent disease, whereas a positive D-dimer result was associated with an 8.9% annual risk for recurrence. These rates should inform decisions about the balance of risks and benefits of prolonging anticoagulation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.