No abstract

The still-influential progressive interpretation of American constitutional history conceives the property-oriented judicial activism of the Supreme Court in the late-nineteenth and early-twentieth centuries (the era of laissez faire) to have been a natural and logical outgrowth of similar orientations on the Marshall and Taney Courts. It is contended here that the progressive theory is rooted in a serious misinterpretation of the early Supreme Court's constitutional decision making. Far from extending the lines of development laid down by its predecessors, the turn-of-the-century Court in fact uprooted the most important traditions of the antebellum era on the issues of national power, commercial regulation, and the scope of the judicial function.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract