Background: In 1994, Mackinnon advocated that plastic surgery residents should have accessible child care to promote a productive return to work. Decades later, lack of adequate child care remains a dilemma for trainees. The authors' survey aims to evaluate childrearing during plastic surgery training. Methods: An anonymous, voluntary survey was sent to plastic surgery residents. It evaluated demographics, childcare accommodations, and attitudes/issues surrounding childrearing during residency. Results: There were 32 respondents: 66 percent women and 34 percent men. Seventy-five percent were married, and 38 percent were parents. Seventy-five percent of male parents compared to 12 percent of female parents reported that their spouse was the primary childcare source. One hundred percent of respondents with children reported that child care creates a financial burden. Three percent of respondents felt their institution provided services to arrange adequate child care. Sixty-three percent of residents felt their program did not allow flexibility to accommodate childcare needs. Female residents missed work twice as often and were twice as likely to require a co-resident to cover clinical duties because of childcare difficulties when compared to male residents (p = 0.296 and p = 0.145). Sixty-seven percent of women agreed with the statement, "If you had to pick a residency program today, the availability of on-site child care would influence your decision," compared to only 9 percent of men (p = 0.002). Conclusions: Training institutions are not meeting the childcare needs of plastic surgery trainees. If the specialty wishes to recruit and retain the top applicants, it must improve the childcare accommodations for residents. All institutions with plastic surgery residency programs should provide affordable, accessible child care that accommodates the 24-hour natures of both patient care and parenthood.

Differences in Rural-Urban Breast ReconstructionThis article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.2 Background: Breast reconstruction (BR) is the reconstructive surgical technique that focuses on restoring normal form and function to the breast following oncologic resection. The goal of this study was to determine if BR disparities exist among rural female patients in Kentucky.Methods: A retrospective (2006 -2015), population-based cohort study was conducted on breast cancer patients (stages I-III) treated with mastectomy with or without BR. We used 2013 Beale codes to stratify patients according to geographic status. Chi-square tests were used to examine the association of BR along the rural-urban continuum. A multivariate logistic regression model controlling for patient, disease, and treatment factors was used to predict BR. The likelihood of BR was reported in odds ratios (OR) using a 95% confidence interval (CI).Results: Overall, 10,032 patients met study criteria. Of those, 2,159 (21.5%) underwent BR. The rate of BR among urban, near-metro, and rural patients was 31.1%, 20.4%, and 13.4%, respectively (P < .001). Multivariate analysis revealed that women from near metro (OR 0.54, CI: 0.47-0.61; P < .001) and rural areas (OR 0.36, CI: 0.31-0.41; P < .001) were less likely to undergo BR than women from urban areas. Conclusion:Although BR benefits are well documented, women from rural Kentucky undergo BR at lower rates and are less likely to receive BR than their urban counterparts. Efforts should seek to promote equitable access to BR for all patients, including those from rural areas.

No abstract

In the field of hernia surgery, there have been many advances in techniques that have provided the surgeon with a variety of options to repair the difficult abdominal wall hernia. Regardless of the technique, the ultimate goal was to provide a tension-free repair, which attempts to approximate the midline while returning abdominal wall musculature to its normal anatomic position, thus providing the patient with both a cosmetic and durable result with or without the use of a prosthetic reinforcement. Component separation techniques have been widely popularized as techniques to repair complex hernias and are frequently categorized based upon the anatomic location of the myofascial release. CSTs are generally categorized as either an anterior component separation or posterior component separation based upon the surgical approach to the abdominal wall musculature. This report objectively outlines the various techniques of component separation and specifically compares the outcomes among techniques to facilitate decision making in abdominal wall reconstruction.