No abstract

Cognitive deficits are a core feature of schizophrenia, but the neural mechanisms that contribute to these characteristics are not fully understood. This study investigated whether volume of the dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), hippocampus, and white matter were associated with impairment in specific cognitive domains, including executive functioning, working memory, verbal memory, verbal fluency, processing speed, versus global functioning. The multi-site data used in this study was collected from the Bipolar and Schizophrenia Network on Intermediate Phenotypes (B-SNIP), and consisted of 206 healthy controls and 247 individuals with either schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. The neuroimaging data was segmented based on the Destrieux atlas in FreeSurfer. Linear regression analyses revealed that global cognition, executive functioning, working memory, and processing speed were associated with all brain structures, except the DLPFC was only associated with executive fucntion. When controlling for the global cognitive deficit, executive function was trending significance with white matter, but continued to be associated with the DLPFC and IFG, as did the association between processing speed and the hippocampus. These findings suggest that volumes of the DLPFC, IFG, hippocampus, and white matter are associated with the global cognitive impairment seen in schizophrenia, but some brain structures may also be specifically related to domain-specific deficits (primarily executive function) over-and-beyond the global cognitive deficit.

Irritability is an important dimension of psychopathology that spans multiple clinical diagnostic categories, yet its relationship to patterns of brain development remains sparsely explored. Here, we examined how transdiagnostic symptoms of irritability relate to the development of structural brain networks. All participants (n = 137, 83 females) completed structural brain imaging with 3 Tesla MRI at two timepoints (mean age at follow-up: 21.1 years, mean inter-scan interval: 5.2 years). Irritability at follow-up was assessed using the Affective Reactivity Index, and cortical thickness was quantified using Advanced Normalization Tools software. Structural covariance networks were delineated using non-negative matrix factorization, a multivariate analysis technique. Both crosssectional and longitudinal associations with irritability at follow-up were evaluated using generalized additive models with penalized splines. The False Discovery Rate (q < 0.05) was used to correct for multiple comparisons. Cross-sectional analysis of follow-up data revealed that 11 of the 24 covariance networks were associated with irritability, with higher levels of irritability being associated with thinner cortex. Longitudinal analyses further revealed that accelerated cortical thinning within nine networks was related to irritability at follow-up. Effects were particularly prominent in brain regions implicated in emotion regulation, including the orbitofrontal, lateral temporal, and medial temporal cortex. Collectively, these findings suggest that irritability is associated with widespread reductions in cortical thickness and accelerated cortical thinning, particularly within the frontal and temporal cortex. Aberrant structural maturation of regions important for emotional regulation may in part underlie symptoms of irritability.

Machine learning has been increasingly applied to neuroimaging data to predict age, deriving a personalized biomarker with potential clinical applications. The scientific and clinical value of these models depends on their applicability to independently acquired scans from diverse sources. Accordingly, we evaluated the generalizability of two brain age models that were trained across the lifespan by applying them to three distinct early-life samples with participants aged 8-22 years. These models were chosen based on the size and diversity of their training data, but they also differed greatly in their processing methods and predictive algorithms. Specifically, one brain age model was built by applying gradient tree boosting (GTB) to extracted features of cortical thickness, surface area, and brain volume. The other model applied a 2D convolutional neural network (DBN) to minimally preprocessed slices of T1-weighted scans. Additional model variants were created to understand how generalizability changed when each model was trained with data that became more similar to the test samples in terms of age and acquisition protocols. Our results illustrated numerous trade-offs. The GTB predictions were relatively more accurate overall and yielded more reliable predictions when applied to lower quality scans. In contrast, the DBN displayed the most utility in detecting associations between brain age gaps and cognitive functioning. Broadly speaking, the largest limitations affecting generalizability were acquisition protocol differences and biased brain age estimates.If such confounds could eventually be removed without post-hoc corrections, brain age predictions may have greater utility as personalized biomarkers of healthy aging.

Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) has advanced our understanding of how brain microstructure evolves over development. However, the proliferation of multi-shell diffusion imaging sequences has coincided with notable advances in the modeling of neuronal diffusion patterns, such as Neurite Orientation Dispersion and Density Imaging (NODDI) and Laplacian-regularized Mean Apparent Propagator MRI (MAPL). The relative utility of these newer diffusion models for understanding brain maturation remains sparsely investigated. Additionally, despite evidence that motion artifact is a major confound for studies of development, the relative vulnerability of these models to in-scanner motion has not been described. Accordingly, in a sample of 123 youth (ages 12-30) we evaluated DTI, NODDI, and MAPL for associations with age and in-scanner head motion at multiple scales, including mean white matter values, voxelwise analyses, and tractography-based structural brain networks. Our results reveal that multi-shell diffusion imaging sequences can be leveraged to robustly characterize neurodevelopment, even within the framework of DTI. However, these metrics of diffusion are variably impacted by motion, highlighting the importance of modeling choices for studies of movement-prone populations. Our findings suggest that while traditional DTI is sensitive to neurodevelopmental trends, contemporary modeling techniques confer key advantages for neurodevelopmental inquiries.