Expected a posteriori (EAP) estimation of ability, based on numerical evaluation of the mean and variance of the posterior distribution, is shown to have unusually good properties for computerized adaptive testing. The calculations are not complex, precede noniteratively by simple summation of log likelihoods as items are added, and require only values of the response function obtainable from precalculated tables at a limited number of quadra-ture points. Simulation studies are reported showing the near equivalence of the posterior standard deviation and the standard error of measurement. When the adaptive testings terminate at a fixed posterior standard deviation criterion of .90 or better, the regression of the EAP estimator on true ability is virtually linear with slope equal to the reliability, and the measurement error homogeneous, in the range & p l u s m n ; 2.5 standard deviations. With the increasing availability of inexpensive ~i~~®~®mp~t~~°s9 adaptive testing of cognitive abilities is fast becoming a practical reality. Many, perhaps most, applications of mental testing will soon benefit from the flexibility and efficiency of computerized adaptive testing. The requisite statistical theory, including realistic item response models (Samejima, 1981) and rigorous methods of item parameter estimation (Bock & Aitkin, 1981; Reiser, 1982; Thissen, 1982), is now available. Production

No abstract

No abstract

complex samples, item response theory, latent structure, missing data, multiple imputation, National Assessment of Educational Progress, sample surveys,

Evidence‐centered assessment design (ECD) provides language, concepts, and knowledge representations for designing and delivering educational assessments, all organized around the evidentiary argument an assessment is meant to embody. This article describes ECD in terms of layers for analyzing domains, laying out arguments, creating schemas for operational elements such as tasks and measurement models, implementing the assessment, and carrying out the operational processes. We argue that this framework helps designers take advantage of developments from measurement, technology, cognitive psychology, and learning in the domains. Examples of ECD tools and applications are drawn from the Principled Assessment Design for Inquiry (PADI) project. Attention is given to implications for large‐scale tests such as state accountability measures, with a special eye for computer‐based simulation tasks.