Comparability of group television and individual administration of the Peebody Picture Vocabulary Teat: Implications for screening. J . due. Pqchol., 1907,68, 137-140. 6. Gum, E. V. and NIORO, M. R. Clessroom learning 88 a function of method of preaenting instructional materials. Peycliot., Rep., 1966, 19, 971-977. 7. MCGREW, J. M., MARCIA, J. E., and WRIGHT, C. K. Branc program, text, and lecture: A 8 ? m~n o~~z , G . h versus cleseroom instruction in foreign language: A study of elementary . Edue., 1964,33, 175-182. 9. h H I F F , S. B. and R E W C H~ Use of TV sg aid to psychotherapy supervision. Arch. Gm. 10. %tow, W. C. Teacher and TV. P a w in the&hoo&, 1967,4,246-254 11. WOODY, ROBERTH. Teaciuxq hypnosis withvideo ta . A=. J . Clin. Hkpn lv, 8,111-112. 12. YONGE, K. A. Use of cloeed-cucwt TV for teaching oGychotherapeutic intediewmg to medical ative inveati ation of instructional media. J . appl. P a . , 1m,m, -508. school children's attitudes. J . P chiat., 1964,10,&1-88.students. C a d .