We evaluated the hypothesis that stunning swine myocardium with brief ischemia reduces oxygen demand in the stunned region and increases tolerance of myocardium to longer periods of ischemia. Wall function was quantified with ultrasonic crystals aligned to measure wall thickening, and stunning was achieved with two cycles of left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) occlusion (10 minutes) and reperfusion (30 minutes), after which the LAD was occluded for 60 minutes and reperfused for 90 minutes. Infarct size (as a percent of risk region) was then determined by incubating myocardium with para-nitro blue tetrazolium. Regional oxygen demand was measured as myocardial oxygen consumption before the 60-minute LAD occlusion in the stunned region; tracer microspheres were used to determine blood flow, and blood from the anterior interventricular vein and left atrium was used to calculate oxygen saturations. After the second reperfusion period, wall thickening in the stunned region was reduced to 1.4 +/- 2.4% compared with 36.7 +/- 2.5% (mean +/- SEM) before ischemia (p less than 0.001). Regional myocardial oxygen consumption after stunning (3.1 +/- 0.7 ml O2/min/100 g) was no different from regional myocardial oxygen consumption before stunning (3.7 +/- 0.6 ml O2/min/100 g). In the nine pigs "preconditioned" by stunning, infarct size was 10.4 +/- 6.3% of the risk region compared with 48.0 +/- 12.7% in the six control pigs subjected to 60 minutes of ischemia without prior stunning (p less than 0.005). The risk regions were similar (14.4 +/- 1.5% vs. 14.6 +/- 1.9% of the left ventricle, preconditioned vs. control pigs, respectively). We conclude that stunning swine myocardium with two cycles of a 10-minute LAD occlusion followed by reperfusion increases ischemic tolerance but that changes in regional demand in stunned myocardium do not predict the marked reduction in infarct size that follows a subsequent 60-minute period of ischemia.

No abstract

BackgroundCSL112 is a new formulation of human apolipoprotein A-I (apoA-I) being developed to reduce cardiovascular events following acute coronary syndrome. This phase 2a, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, dose-ranging trial represents the first clinical investigation to assess the safety and pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of a CSL112 infusion among patients with stable atherosclerotic disease.Methods and ResultsPatients were randomized to single ascending doses of CSL112 (1.7, 3.4, or 6.8 g) or placebo, administered over a 2-hour period. Primary safety assessments consisted of alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase elevations >3× upper limits of normal and study drug–related adverse events. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic assessments included apoA-I plasma concentration and measures of the ability of serum to promote cholesterol efflux from cells ex vivo. Of 45 patients randomized, 7, 12, and 14 received 1.7-, 3.4-, and 6.8-g CSL112, respectively, and 11 received placebo. There were no clinically significant elevations (>3× upper limit of normal) in alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase. Adverse events were nonserious and mild and occurred in 5 (71%), 5 (41%), and 6 (43%) patients in the CSL112 1.7-, 3.4-, and 6.8-g groups, respectively, compared with 3 (27%) placebo patients. The imbalance in adverse events was attributable to vessel puncture/infusion-site bruising. CSL112 resulted in rapid (Tmax≈2 hours) and dose-dependent increases in apoA-I (145% increase in the 6.8-g group) and total cholesterol efflux (up to 3.1-fold higher than placebo) (P<0.001).ConclusionsCSL112 infusion was well tolerated in patients with stable atherosclerotic disease. CSL112 immediately raised apoA-I levels and caused a rapid and marked increase in the capacity of serum to efflux cholesterol. This potential novel approach for the treatment of atherosclerosis warrants further investigation.Clinical Trial RegistrationURL: http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01499420.

The list of growth factors with angiogenic potential is growing. It is not clear why so many factors with angiogenic potential exist, although Folkman postulated that this apparent redundancy is indicative of the essential nature of the angiogenic response. Additionally, these factors or their close relatives have other biological activities, including developmental morphogenesis, tumourigenesis, regeneration of injured tissue, and immunosignalling. Recent advances in the understanding of these factors include primary peptide sequence for all but one peptide growth factor included in this review, identification of cell surface receptors for many, and extensive characterisation of biological potential. Despite the torrent of data on angiogenic growth factors in the last decade, the chasm between form and physiology remains formidable.