A novel two-spool turbofan engine configuration is described which uses a booster powered by both the low an high pressure spools. Design and off-design performance analysis shows the operating characteristics of the configuration, and a mechanical feasibility study of the gearbox is presented. The trends toward ever higher engine overall pressure ratio and bypass ratio have resulted in a combination of higher pressure ratio and lower blade speed in the booster compressor of conventional two-spool turbofans. This combination gives rise to many stages in the booster and/or lower booster efficiency and also a higher degree of off-design mismatch between the core compressors. The current paper describes an engine architecture which aims to alleviate both these issues by powering the booster compressor from both low and high pressure spools through an epicyclic gear system. We have called this engine architecture the dual drive booster. The concept gives the engine designer greater flexibility to optimize component performance and work split, resulting in the potential for lower cruise specific fuel consumption and higher hot-day takeoff thrust capability than current engine configurations. The gear system is described along with the mathematical derivation of the booster rotational speed in terms of LP- and HP-spool speeds. Both the design point and off-design performance modeling have been conducted and comparison is made between a conventional turbofan and a turbofan fitted with the dual drive booster. The results show a significant enhancement in takeoff thrust due to the better speed match of the booster. The paper also describes the results of a preliminary study into the design and mechanical feasibility of the engine architecture and gear system. The presented concept is an alternative to the conventional turbofan and should be considered during the conceptual design of future aircraft engines.

The effects of high shaft power offtake (POT) in a direct drive, a geared drive, and a novel turbofan configuration are investigated. A design and off-design performance analysis shows the configuration specific limitations and advantages. The more electric aircraft (MEA) concept promises to offer advantages with respect to aircraft performance, maintenance, and operating costs. The engines for the MEA concept are based on conventional turbofan architectures. These engines are designed for significantly increased shaft POT that is required by the airframe, and the shaft power is usually taken off the high-pressure (HP) spool. This can impair the off-design performance of the engine and lead to compromises during engine design and to operability limitations. Taking the power off the low-pressure (LP) spool mitigates some of the problems but has other limitations. In this work, an alternative novel turbofan architecture is investigated for its potential to avoid the problems related to high shaft POTs. This architecture is called the dual drive booster because it uses a summation gearbox to drive the booster from both the LP and HP spool. The shaft power, if taken off the booster spool, is effectively provided by both the LP and HP spools, which allows the provision of very high power levels. This new concept is benchmarked against a two-spool direct drive and a geared drive turbofan (GTF). Furthermore, it is described, how the new architecture can incorporate an embedded motor generator. The presented concept mitigates some of the problems, which are encountered during high POT in conventional configurations. In particular, the core compressors are less affected by a change in shaft POT. This allows higher POTs and gives more flexibility during engine design and operation. Additionally, the potential to use the new configuration as a gas turbine-electric hybrid engine is assessed, where electrical power boost is applied during critical flight phases. The ability to convert additional shaft power is compared with conventional configurations. Here, the new configuration also shows superior behavior because the core compressors are significantly less affected by power input than in conventional configurations. The spool speed and its variation are more suitable for electrical machines than in conventional configuration with LP spool power transfer. The dual drive booster concept is particularly suited for applications with high shaft POTs and inputs, and should be considered for propulsion of MEAs.

The effects of high shaft power offtake in a direct drive, a geared drive, and a novel turbofan configuration are investigated. A design and off-design performance analysis shows the configuration specific limitations and advantages. The more electric aircraft (MEA) concept promises to offer advantages with respect to aircraft performance, maintenance and operating costs. The engines for the MEA concept are based on conventional turbofan architectures. These engines are designed for significantly increased shaft power offtake that is required by the airframe, and the shaft power is usually taken off the high-pressure spool. This can impair the off-design performance of the engine and lead to compromises during engine design and to operability limitations. Taking the power off the low-pressure spool mitigates some of the problems but has other limitations. In this work, an alternative novel turbofan architecture is investigated for its potential to avoid the problems related to high shaft power offtakes. This architecture is called the dual drive booster because it uses a summation gearbox to drive the booster from both the low- and high-pressure spool. The shaft power, if taken off the booster spool, is effectively provided by both the low- and high-pressure spools, which allows the provision of very high power levels. This new concept is benchmarked against a two-spool direct drive and a geared drive turbofan. Furthermore, it is described, how the new architecture can incorporate an embedded motor generator. The presented concept mitigates some of the problems which are encountered during high power offtake in conventional configurations. In particular, the core compressors are less affected by a change in shaft power offtake. This allows higher power offtakes and gives more flexibility during engine design and operation. Additionally, the potential to use the new configuration as a gas turbine-electric hybrid engine is assessed, where electrical power boost is applied during critical flight phases. The ability to convert additional shaft power is compared with conventional configurations. Here, the new configuration also shows superior behavior because the core compressors are significantly less affected by power input than in conventional configurations. The spool speed and its variation is more suitable for electrical machines than in conventional configuration with low-pressure spool power transfer. The dual drive booster concept is particularly suited for applications with high shaft power offtakes and inputs, and should be considered for propulsion of more electric aircrafts.

A novel two-spool turbofan engine configuration is described which uses a booster powered by both the LP and HP spool. Design and off-design performance analysis shows the operating characteristics of the configuration and a mechanical feasibility study of the gearbox is presented. The trends towards ever higher engine overall pressure ratio and bypass ratio have resulted in a combination of higher pressure ratio and lower blade speed in the booster compressor of conventional two spool turbofans. This combination gives rise to many stages in the booster and/or lower booster efficiency and also a higher degree of off-design miss-match between the core compressors. The current paper describes an engine architecture which aims to alleviate both these issues by powering the booster compressor from both LP and HP spools through an epicyclic gear system. We have called this engine architecture the Dual Drive Booster. The concept gives the engine designer greater flexibility to optimize component performance and work split, resulting in the potential for lower cruise SFC and higher hot day take-off thrust capability than current engine configurations. The gear system is described along with the mathematical derivation of the booster rotational speed in terms of LP and HP spool speeds. Both design point and off-design performance modelling has been conducted and comparison is made between a conventional turbofan and a turbofan fitted with the Dual Drive Booster. The results show a significant enhancement in take-off thrust due to the better speed match of the booster. The paper also describes the results of a preliminary study into the design and mechanical feasibility of the engine architecture and gear system. The presented concept is an alternative to the conventional turbofan and should be considered during the conceptual design of future aircraft engines.