No abstract

This self-report questionnaire, which can be completed in 5-10 min, may help us understand more about the role of stigma of psychiatric illness in research and clinical settings.

Lifeline Australia Inc provides a free 24 hour telephone counselling and referral service to all Australians. The trained telephone counsellors of the service record information on many of their calls in Lifeline's Client Service Management Information System (CSMIS). This paper presents a descriptive summary of a national CSMIS data set, which was compiled during a three month period in 2003. The CSMIS data provided a clear national profile of the callers to the service. The results of this study support the hypothesis that callers are generally seeking social support from the service. The discussion explores the implications of this finding for Lifeline and other generalist counselling and referral services and their capacity to offer suicide intervention to the community.

This paper investigates gender differences in students' approaches to learning in higher education. Previous studies have found some evidence for gender differences, but interpretation of these findings has been problematic given arange of methodological limitations including poor response rates and the inappropriate use of univariate statistical analyses. The Study Process Questionnaire (Biggs, 1987) and the abbreviated Approaches to Study Inventory (Entwistle, 1981) were both administered to two samples of first yearpsychology students. R,esponse rates of98 percent and 61 percent were achieved, and results were analysed using multivariate procedures. No gender differences were found on the equivalent deep, surface or achieving scales with either instrument. Significant correlations between the deep, surface and achieving scales of the SPQ and AS1 were found, suggesting that both are measuring similar constructs.How people approach learning, that is, the relative emphasis they give to the understanding of concepts or the reproduction of facts, and how they organise their Learning environment (Ramsden, 1992), has been a long-standing and important area of inquiry in higher education. Research has consistently identified three approaches to adult learning, labelled most commonly as deep, surface and achieving. A deep level approach refers to an active orientation to the learning task characterised by a search for meaning, a focus on the content as a whole and attempts to see the interrelationship between different parts (Biggs, 1987). By contrast, a surface approach is characterised by extrinsic motivation, a focus on elements rather than the task as a whole, and the application of rote learning strategies (Biggs, 1992). An achieving or strategic approach is characterised by a highly organised approach to study and high achievement motivation (Watkins, 1982).Until recently there has been little systematic investigation into gender differences in approaches to learning in higher education. Investigations have typically taken the form of quantitative measurement of approaches to learning using either the Study Process Questionnaire (SPQ) (Biggs, 1979) or the Approaches to Study Inventory (ASI) (Entwistle, Hanley & Hounsell, 1979). Both instruments measure the three major dimensions of deep, surface and achieving approaches to learning. The SPQ, derived from the theoretical and empirical literature defining the 'personal qualities' judged to be important to academic learning, measures approaches to learning in terms of subscales reflecting the student's motives and strategies on each of the three major dimensions. The ASI, derived from

This study sought to compare the sensitivity and precision of Embase, Medline and PsycINFO bibliographic database searches for randomized controlled trials of cognitive therapy for depression. Searches in each database combined with a hand search in five selected journals formed the total pool against which each search was assessed. Sensitivities of standard searches (index terms only) were 68%, 84% and 38% in Embase, Medline and PsycINFO respectively. Sensitivities of expert searches (index and free text terms) were 76%, 97% and 65% for Embase, Medline and PsycINFO respectively. Medline appears to be the most efficient at identifying articles describing psychological treatment evaluation.