Interindividual gene copy-number variation (CNV) of complement component C4 and its associated polymorphisms in gene size (long and short) and protein isotypes (C4A and C4B) probably lead to different susceptibilities to autoimmune disease. We investigated the C4 gene CNV in 1,241 European Americans, including patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), their first-degree relatives, and unrelated healthy subjects, by definitive genotyping and phenotyping techniques. The gene copy number (GCN) varied from 2 to 6 for total C4, from 0 to 5 for C4A, and from 0 to 4 for C4B. Four copies of total C4, two copies of C4A, and two copies of C4B were the most common GCN counts, but each constituted only between one-half and three-quarters of the study populations. Long C4 genes were strongly correlated with C4A (R=0.695; P<.0001). Short C4 genes were correlated with C4B (R=0.437; P<.0001). In comparison with healthy subjects, patients with SLE clearly had the GCN of total C4 and C4A shifting to the lower side. The risk of SLE disease susceptibility significantly increased among subjects with only two copies of total C4 (patients 9.3%; unrelated controls 1.5%; odds ratio [OR] = 6.514; P=.00002) but decreased in those with > or =5 copies of C4 (patients 5.79%; controls 12%; OR=0.466; P=.016). Both zero copies (OR=5.267; P=.001) and one copy (OR=1.613; P=.022) of C4A were risk factors for SLE, whereas > or =3 copies of C4A appeared to be protective (OR=0.574; P=.012). Family-based association tests suggested that a specific haplotype with a single short C4B in tight linkage disequilibrium with the -308A allele of TNFA was more likely to be transmitted to patients with SLE. This work demonstrates how gene CNV and its related polymorphisms are associated with the susceptibility to a human complex disease.
The MITAX, MYOACT and MDI tools, which are now undergoing validity testing, should enhance the consistency, comprehensiveness and reliability of disease activity and damage assessment in patients with myositis.
We developed preliminary core sets of measures for disease activity and damage assessment in JSLE and JDM. The prospective validation of the core sets is in progress.
The complement component C4 genes located in the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class III region exhibit an unusually complex pattern of variations in gene number, gene size, and nucleotide polymorphism. Duplication or deletion of a C4 gene always concurs with its neighboring genes serine/threonine nuclear protein kinase RP, steroid 21-hydroxylase (CYP21), and tenascin (TNX), which together form a genetic unit termed the RCCX module. A detailed molecular genetic analysis of C4A and C4B and RCCX modular arrangements was correlated with immunochemical studies of C4A and C4B protein polymorphism in 150 normal Caucasians. The results show that bimodular RCCX has a frequency of 69%, whereas monomodular and trimodular RCCX structures account for 17.0 and 14.0%, respectively. Three quarters of C4 genes harbor the endogenous retrovirus HERV-K(C4). Partial deficiencies of C4A and C4B, primarily due to gene deletions and homoexpression of C4A proteins, have a combined frequency of 31.6%. This is probably the most common variation of gene dosage and gene size in human genomes. The seven RCCX physical variants create a great repertoire of haplotypes and diploid combinations, and a heterozygosity frequency of 69.4%. This phenomenon promotes the exchange of genetic information among RCCX constituents that is important in homogenizing the structural and functional diversities of C4A and C4B proteins. However, such length variants may cause unequal, interchromosomal crossovers leading to MHC-associated diseases. An analyses of the RCCX structures in 22 salt-losing, congenital adrenal hyperplasia patients revealed a significant increase in the monomodular structure with a long C4 gene linked to the pseudogene CYP21A, and bimodular structures with two CYP21A, which are likely generated by recombinations between heterozygous RCCX length variants.
Objectives
Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (sJIA) is characterized by fevers, rash and arthritis, for which IL1 and IL6 inhibitors appear effective. Pulmonary artery hypertension (PAH), interstitial lung disease (ILD) and alveolar proteinosis (AP) have been recently reported in sJIA patients with increased frequency. Our aim was to characterize and compare these cases to a larger cohort of sJIA patients.
Methods
sJIA patients who developed PAH, ILD and/or AP were identified through an electronic listserv, and their demographic, sJIA and pulmonary disease characteristics, and medication exposure information were collected. These features were compared to a cohort of sJIA patients enrolled in the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) Registry.
Results
Patients (N=25) were significantly (p<0.05) more likely than the CARRA registry cohort (N=389) to be female, have more systemic features, and to have been exposed to an IL-1 inhibitor, tocilizumab, infliximab, corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin, cyclosporine and cyclophosphamide. Eighty% were diagnosed after 2004. Twenty (80%) patients had MAS during their disease course and 15 (60%) had MAS at pulmonary diagnosis. Sixteen patients had PAH, 5 AP and 7 ILD. Seventeen (68%) patients were taking or recently (≤1 month) discontinued a biologic agent at pulmonary symptom onset; 12 (48%) were taking anti-IL1 therapy (primarily anakinra). Seventeen (68%) patients died at a mean of 8.8 months from pulmonary diagnosis.
Conclusions
PAH, AP and ILD are under-recognized complications of sJIA which are frequently fatal. These may be the result of severe uncontrolled systemic disease activity, and may be influenced by medication exposure.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.