Objectives To validate the previously proposed classifi cation criteria for Henoch-Schönlein purpura (HSP), childhood polyarteritis nodosa (c-PAN), c-Wegener granulomatosis (c-WG) and c-Takayasu arteritis (c-TA). MethodsStep 1: retrospective/prospective webdata collection for children with HSP, c-PAN, c-WG and c-TA with age at diagnosis ≤18 years.Step 2: blinded classifi cation by consensus panel of a representative sample of 280 cases.Step 3: statistical (sensitivity, specifi city, area under the curve and κ-agreement) and nominal group technique consensus evaluations. Results 827 patients with HSP, 150 with c-PAN, 60 with c-WG, 87 with c-TA and 52 with c-other were compared with each other. A patient was classifi ed as HSP in the presence of purpura or petechiae (mandatory) with lower limb predominance plus one of four criteria: (1) abdominal pain; (2) histopathology (IgA); (3) arthritis or arthralgia; (4) renal involvement. Classifi cation of c-PAN required a systemic infl ammatory disease with evidence of necrotising vasculitis OR angiographic abnormalities of medium-/small-sized arteries (mandatory criterion) plus one of fi ve criteria: (1) skin involvement; (2) myalgia/ muscle tenderness; (3) hypertension; (4) peripheral neuropathy; (5) renal involvement. Classifi cation of c-WG required three of six criteria: (1) histopathological evidence of granulomatous infl ammation; (2) upper airway involvement; (3) laryngo-tracheo-bronchial involvement; (4) pulmonary involvement (x-ray/CT); (5) antineutrophilic cytoplasmic antibody positivity; (6) renal involvement. Classifi cation of c-TA required typical angiographic abnormalities of the aorta or its main branches and pulmonary arteries (mandatory criterion) plus one of fi ve criteria: (1) pulse defi cit or claudication; (2) blood pressure discrepancy in any limb; (3) bruits; (4) hypertension; (5) Paediatric Rheumatology European Society propose validated classifi cation criteria for HSP, c-PAN, c-WG and c-TA with high sensitivity/specifi city. INTRODUCTIONIn 1990 the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) proposed classifi cation criteria for patients with vasculitides 1-5 by analysing 807 adults patients with different form of vasculitis: 85 with Henoch-Schönlein purpura (HSP), 118 with polyarteritis nodosa (PAN), 85 with Wegener granulomatosis (WG), 63 with Takayasu arteritis (TA) and 456 with other vasculitides (Churg-Strauss, hypersensitivity, giant cell arteritis and other unspecifi ed forms). 6 Patients with each specifi c vasculitis were compared with all the remaining diseases grouped into a single control category.The ACR criteria for HSP (sensitivity 87.1%, specifi city 87.7%) require the presence of at least two of the following: (1) age ≤20 years at disease onset; (2) palpable purpura; (3) acute abdominal pain; (4) biopsy showing granulocytes in the walls of small arterioles/venules. 1 The ACR criteria for PAN (sensitivity 82.2%, specifi city 86.6%) require at least three of the 10 following criteria: (1) granulocyte or mixed leucocyte infi ...

Guidelines and recommendations developed and/or endorsed by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) are intended to provide guidance for particular patterns of practice and not to dictate the care of a particular patient. The ACR considers adherence to these guidelines and recommendations to be voluntary, with the ultimate determination regarding their application to be made by the physician in light of each patient’s individual circumstances. Guidelines and recommendations are intended to promote beneficial or desirable outcomes but cannot guarantee any specific outcome. Guidelines and recommendations developed or endorsed by the ACR are subject to periodic revision as warranted by the evolution of medical knowledge, technology, and practice.

No abstract

Objective. To prospectively validate the preliminary criteria for clinical inactive disease (CID) in patients with select categories of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA).Methods. We used the process for development of classification and response criteria recommended by the American College of Rheumatology Quality of Care Committee. Patient-visit profiles were extracted from the phase III randomized controlled trial of infliximab in polyarticular-course JIA (i.e., patients considered to resemble those with select categories of JIA) and sent to an international group of expert physician raters. Using the physician ratings as the gold standard, the sensitivity and specificity were calculated using the preliminary criteria. Modifications to the criteria were made, and these were sent to a larger group of pediatric rheumatologists to determine quantitative, face, and content validity. Results. Variables weighted heaviest by physicians when making their judgment were the number of joints with active arthritis, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), physician's global assessment, and duration of morning stiffness. Three modifications were made: the definition of uveitis, the definition of abnormal ESR, and the addition of morning stiffness. These changes did not alter the accuracy of the preliminary set. Conclusion. The modified criteria, termed the "criteria for CID in select categories of JIA," have excellent feasibility and face, content, criterion, and discriminant validity to detect CID in select categories of JIA. The small changes made to the preliminary criteria set did not alter the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.954) or accuracy (91%), but have increased face and content validity. This criteria set has been approved by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Board of Directors as Provisional. This signifies that the criteria set has been quantitatively validated using patient data, but it has not undergone validation based on an external data set. All ACR-approved criteria sets are expected to undergo intermittent updates.As disclosed in the manuscript, these criteria were developed with partial financial support from industry sources. The industry supporters were not involved in any stage of criteria development. As a courtesy, the authors sent copies of submitted manuscripts to their industry supporters, but review and approval of the manuscripts were neither requested nor given.Although current ACR practice is to decline requests for review of criteria that have been supported by industry, an exception was made in this case due to prior ACR project support and because the ACR policy change took place after the industry support was solicited and received by the investigators. ACR is an independent professional, medical and scientific society which does not guarantee, warrant or endorse any commercial product or service. The ACR reviewed this manuscript on its merits and found the criteria to be methodologically rigorous and clinically meaningful. The ACR received no compensati...