No abstract

Our data suggest that vitamin D deficiency in SLE may play a role in perpetuation of the disease.

ObjectiveTo develop and test reduced joint counts in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA).MethodsFour reduced joint counts including 45, 35, 27, and 10 joints were devised by a panel of experienced pediatric rheumatologists, who selected the joints to be included based on the ease of technical assessment, functional relevance, and frequency of involvement. Three large samples of patients with JIA (total n = 4353) who had a detailed joint assessment available were used to develop and test reduced joint counts. Performance of reduced counts was examined by comparing their Spearman correlation with the standard (i.e., complete) joint count. Construct validity was evaluated by calculating Spearman correlation with other JIA outcome measures. Responsiveness to clinical change was determined through the standardized response mean (SRM).ResultsSpearman correlations of reduced joint counts with the whole joint count and with the other JIA outcome measures were comparable, revealing that they had similar ability to serve as surrogate for the whole joint count and construct validity. Responsiveness to clinical change was also comparable across reduced counts (SRM 0.83–1.09 for active joint counts and 0.63–0.81 for restricted joint counts). Based on these results and considering the relative feasibility of the different counts, the 27-joint reduced count is proposed for use in JIA. This joint count includes the cervical spine and the elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal (from first to third), proximal interphalangeal, hip, knee, and ankle joints.ConclusionReduced joint counts appear to be as reliable as standard joint counts in assessment of the severity of joint disease and its change over time in children with JIA.

In this review we describe an international project, conducted by the Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organization (PRINTO) that was aimed to identify, validate and promulgate core sets of measures and a definition of improvement for the evaluation of response to therapy in clinical trials and in daily clinical practice in patients with juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus (JSLE). The following clinical measures were included in the PRINTO core set of outcome measure for the evaluation of response to therapy: 1) physician's global assessment of disease activity; 2) global disease activity measure; 3) 24-hour proteinuria; 4) parent's global assessment of the overall patient's well-being; 5) health-related quality of life assessment. The measures included in the core set were found to be feasible and not redundant, to have good construct validity, discriminative ability, internal consistency, with fair responsiveness to clinically important change in disease activity, and to be associated strongly with treatment outcome. In order to be classified as responder to a given treatment, a patient should demonstrate at least 50% improvement from baseline in any two of the five core set measures with no more than one of the remaining worsening by more than 30%. This definition is now known as the 'PRINTO/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) provisional criteria for JSLE'. The proposed core set and definition of improvement incorporate clinically meaningful change in a composite endpoint for the evaluation of global response to therapy in JSLE. The definition is now proposed for use in JSLE clinical trials, and may help physicians to decide if a child with SLE has responded adequately to therapy.