Reexamined literature cited in previous reviews (W. H. Mobley et al [see PA, Vol 62:9973]; P. M. Muchinsky and M. L. Tuttle [see PA, Vol 64:4296]; and L. Porter and R. M. Steers [see PA, Vol 51:4029]) on the relationship between behavior intentions and employee turnover using meta-analysis procedures. The extent to which moderator variables could be employed to explain variation in findings across intent–turnover studies was assessed. A weighted average correlation of .50 was calculated between behavioral intentions and employee turnover. Intentions were more predictive of attrition than overall job satisfaction, satisfaction with work itself, or organizational commitment. The length of time between procurement of predictor and criterion data influenced the magnitude of intent–turnover relationships. (83 ref)
A meta-analytic study was conducted involving primarily published research from 1%6 to 1984 and focusing on the relationship between goal-setting variables and task performance. Two major sets of studies were analyzed, those contrasting hard goals (goal difficulty) versus easy goals, and those comparing specific hard goals (goal specificity/difftculty) versus general goals, "do best" instructions, or no goal. As expected, strong support was obtained for the goal difficulty and goal specificity/difficulty components of E. A. Locke's (1968a, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 3, 157-189) theory. A two-stage approach was employed to identify potential moderators of the goal difficulty and goal specificity/difficulty-performance relationships. Setting (laboratory versus field) was identified as a moderator of the relationship between goal specificity/difftculty and task performance. Two supplemental meta-analyses yielded support for the efficacy of combining specific hard goals with feedback versus specific hard goals without feedback and for participatively set goals versus assigned goal setting (when goal level is held constant), although this latter finding was interpreted as inconclusive based on the limited studies available. Implications for future research are addressed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.