Introduction: Children admitted to paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) are at risk of acute kidney injury (AKI). However, few paediatric studies have focused on the identification of factors potentially associated with the development of this condition. The aim of our study was to assess the incidence rate of AKI, identify risk factors, and evaluate clinical outcome in a large sample of critically ill children. Methods: This retrospective observational study was conducted including patients admitted to our PICU from January 2014 to December 2016. AKI was defined according to Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcome criteria. Results: A total of 222 PICU patients out of 811 (27%) had AKI (stage I 39%, stage II 24%, stage III 37%). The most common PICU admission diagnoses in AKI cases were heart disease (38.6%), respiratory failure (16.8%) and postsurgical non-cardiac patients (11%). Hypoxic-ischaemic was the most frequent cause of AKI. Significant risk factors for AKI following multivariate analysis were age >2 months (OR 2.43; 95% CI 1.03–7.87; p = 0.05), serum creatinine at admission >44 µmol/L (OR 2.23; 95% CI 1.26–3.94; p = 0.006), presence of comorbidities (OR 1.84; 95% CI 1.03–3.30; p = 0.04), use of inotropes (OR 2.56; 95% CI 1.23–5.35; p= 0.012) and diuretics (OR 2.78; 95% CI 1.49–5.19; p = 0.001), exposure to nephrotoxic drugs (OR 1.66; 95% CI 1.01–2.91; p= 0.04), multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (OR 2.68; 95% CI 1.43–5.01; p = 0.002), and coagulopathy (OR 1.89; 95% CI 1.05–3.38, p = 0.03). AKI was associated with a significant longer PICU stay (median LOS of 8 days, interquartile range [IQR] 3–16, versus 4 days, IQR 2–8, in non-AKI patients; p < 0.001). The mortality rate resulted tenfold higher in AKI than non-AKI patients (12.6 vs. 1.2%; p < 0.001). Conclusions: The incidence of AKI in critically ill children is high, with an associated increased length of stay and risk of mortality. In the PICU setting, risk factors of AKI are multiple and mainly associated with illness severity.
BackgroundWe aimed to examine current bedside analgesia/sedation (A/S) and pain assessment (PA) practices in Italian neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in relation to the findings of an epidemiological European study and recently-introduced national guidelines.MethodsWe analyzed the Italian data from the EUROPAIN (EUROpean-Pain-Audit-In-Neonates) prospective observational study on A/S practices that involved 6680 newborns admitted to tertiary-level NICUs in 18 European countries. Demographics, type of assisted ventilation, type and mode of A/S administration and PA were analyzed. Multivariate linear regression models were used to identify factors predicting A/S and PA practices.ResultsFrom October 1st, 2012 to June 30th, 2013, thirty Italian NICUs gathered data on 422 newborn: 131 on invasive ventilation (IV); 150 on noninvasive ventilation (NIV); and 141 on spontaneous ventilation (SV). A/S was documented for 35.3% of all infants admitted (86.3% IV; 17.3% NIV; 7.1% SV [p = 0.0001]), and varied considerably between NICUs (as reported in other European countries). Strong analgesics were used in 32.5% of cases, sedatives in 10.2%, mild analgesics in 3.8%. Fentanyl was used in 78.6% of cases, morphine in 8.4%, neuromuscular blockers in 5.3%, midazolam in 22.1%. The performance of PA was documented in 67.5% of all newborn (85.5% IV; 67.3% NIV; 51.1% SV [p = 0.001]). Illness severity, type of ventilation, bedside PA, and number of NICU beds were all factors associated with A/S use on multivariate analysis, while gestational age ≤ 32 weeks, and type of ventilation and presence of a pain team were associated with PA.ConclusionsWe documented a generally widespread, but still highly variable use of A/S and PA at Italian NICUs, despite the diffusion of national guidelines. There is an urgent need to improve routine PA to enable customized pain and stress control (and prevention) in all infants.Trial registrationClinical Trials.gov # NCT01694745.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13052-017-0343-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
No abstract
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.