Background: Recurrence of deformity remains a concern when fusing the first tarsometatarsal joint for correction of hallux valgus (HV). A recently described construct adds an additional point of fixation from the plantar medial first metatarsal to the intermediate cuneiform. The purpose of this study was to determine the maintenance of correction of the first and second intermetatarsal angle, hallux valgus angle, and tibial sesamoid position after undergoing a first tarsometatarsal joint arthrodesis using the proposed construct. Methods: A radiographic review was performed of patients with HV treated with a first tarsometatarsal joint arthrodesis with the addition of a cross-screw intermediate cuneiform construct. Three observers reviewed radiographic data, including preoperative weightbearing, first weightbearing, and final weightbearing plain-film radiographs. Initial improvement and maintenance of intermetatarsal angle, hallux valgus angle (HVA), and tibial sesamoid position were evaluated radiographically. A total of 62 patients met inclusion criteria and were included in the study. Mean follow-up time was 9.3 months (SD 6.7). Results: Bony union was achieved in 60 of 62 patients (96.7%). Two of 62 patients required revision surgery as a result of recurrence (3.3%). Final mean improvement of the intermetatarsal angle (IMA) was 6.8 degrees (±2.9 degrees), HVA was 14.8 degrees (±7.5 degrees), and tibial sesamoid position was 2.4 (±1.4) positions. Mean loss of IMA correction was 1.5 degrees (±1.6), HVA was 2.9 degrees (±4.8 degrees), and tibial sesamoid position was 0.8 (±0.8). Conclusion: This study showed that the cross-screw intermediate cuneiform construct for first tarsometatarsal joint arthrodesis had a good union rate, a low complication rate, and maintained radiographic correction. Level of Evidence: Level IV, retrospective case series.
To understand the medial ankle anatomy, as it pertains to insertion of flexible syndesmotic fixation in a cadaveric model, to aid in prevention of clinical iatrogenic injury.
Background: Total ankle arthroplasty is a viable option for the treatment of end stage ankle arthritis. The purpose of this study is to report on the mid-term results with a cemented total ankle prosthesis, the Inbone™ II implant over a 5 year period. Methods: A retrospective, single-center chart and radiographic review of all patients with end stage ankle arthritis treated with Inbone™ II TAR) as the primary index procedure from 12/1/2012 to 3/1/2017. Clinical data were evaluated at 3 month, 6 month, 1 year and subsequent intervals for the study period. Preoperative diagnosis, pertinent patient demographics adjunctive procedures, implant associated complications, subsequent surgeries, and revisions were recorded. Results: 121 total ankles met our inclusion criteria. Patients had an INBONE™ II TAR implant placed with bone cement with a minimum of a 12 months follow up. Average age was 62.88 (range, 32-87) years, average body mass index was 32.74 (range, 21.8-56.04) kg/m2 and average follow up was 28.51(range, 12-69) months. Using the COFAS complication classification there were 14 minor, 11 moderate, and 5 major complications. 6/121 (5.0%) revisions which included: polyethylene exchange, device explant/fusion, and antibiotic spacer in situ. No complications over the course of this study ended in amputation. Conclusion: Total Ankle Arthroplasty utilizing the cemented INBONE™ II yielded good midterm results with regards to minor, moderate, and major complications. Rate of revision 6/121 (5.0%) was within the reported range with only 5 patients converted to fusion during the study period resulting in a 95% survivability at mid-term follow up. Levels of Evidence: Level IV: Retrospective case series
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.