Background and objective About 9% of gastric carcinomas have Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) in the tumour cells, but it is unclear whether viral presence influences clinical progression. We therefore examined a large multicentre case series for the association of tumour EBV status with survival after gastric cancer diagnosis, accounting for surgical stage and other prognostic factors. Methods We combined individual-level data on 4599 gastric cancer patients diagnosed between 1976 and 2010 from 13 studies in Asia (n=8), Europe (n=3), and Latin America (n=2). EBV positivity of tumours was assessed by in situ hybridisation. Mortality HRs for EBV positivity were estimated by Cox regression models stratified by study, adjusted for distributions of sex (71% male), age (mean 58 years), stage (52% tumour-node-metastasis stages III or IV), tumour histology (49% poorly differentiated, 57% Lauren intestinal-type), anatomic subsite (70% non-cardia) and year of diagnosis. Variations by study and continent were assessed using study-specific HRs for EBV positivity. Results During median 3.0 years follow-up, 49% of patients died. Stage was strongly predictive of mortality, with unadjusted HRs (vs stage I) of 3.1 for stage II, 8.1 for stage III and 13.2 for stage IV. Tumour EBV positivity was 8.2% overall and inversely associated with stage (adjusted OR: 0.79 per unit change). Adjusted for stage and other confounders, EBV positivity was associated with lower mortality (HR, 0.72; 95% CI 0.61 to 0.86), with low heterogeneity among the study populations (p=0.2). The association did not significantly vary across patient or tumour characteristics. There was no significant variation among the three continent-specific HRs (p=0.4). Conclusions Our findings suggest that tumour EBV positivity is an additional prognostic indicator in gastric cancer. Further studies are warranted to identify the mechanisms underlying this protective association.

Pretherapeutic serum albumin level is a significant prognostic factor, which should be evaluated along with other well-defined prognostic factors in decisions concerning therapy for GC.

Helicobacter pylori (Hp) is the primary cause of gastric cancer but we know little of its relative abundance and other microbes in the stomach, especially at the time of gastric cancer diagnosis. Here we characterized the taxonomic and derived functional profiles of gastric microbiota in two different sets of gastric cancer patients, and compared them with microbial profiles in other body sites. Paired non-malignant and tumor tissues were sampled from 160 gastric cancer patients with 80 from China and 80 from Mexico. The 16S rRNA gene V3–V4 region was sequenced using MiSeq platform for taxonomic profiles. PICRUSt was used to predict functional profiles. Human Microbiome Project was used for comparison. We showed that Hp is the most abundant member of gastric microbiota in both Chinese and Mexican samples (51 and 24%, respectively), followed by oral-associated bacteria. Taxonomic (phylum-level) profiles of stomach microbiota resembled oral microbiota, especially when the Helicobacter reads were removed. The functional profiles of stomach microbiota, however, were distinct from those found in other body sites and had higher inter-subject dissimilarity. Gastric microbiota composition did not differ by Hp colonization status or stomach anatomic sites, but did differ between paired non-malignant and tumor tissues in either Chinese or Mexican samples. Our study showed that Hp is the dominant member of the non-malignant gastric tissue microbiota in many gastric cancer patients. Our results provide insights on the gastric microbiota composition and function in gastric cancer patients, which may have important clinical implications.

In this paper, the roles of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) in gastric carcinogenesis are discussed, reviewing mainly epidemiological and clinicopathological studies. About 10% of gastric carcinomas harbor clonal EBV. LMP1, an important EBV oncoprotein, is only rarely expressed in EBV-associated gastric carcinoma (EBV-GC) while EBV-encoded small RNA is expressed in almost every EBV-GC cell, suggesting its importance for developing and maintaining this carcinoma. In addition, the hypermethylation-driven suppressor gene downregulation, frequently observed in EBV-GC, appears to give a selective advantage for carcinoma cells. EBV reactivation is suspected to precede EBV-GC development since antibodies against EBV-related antigens, including EBV capsid antigen (VCA), are elevated in prediagnostic sera. Interestingly, the average anti-VCA immunoglobulin G antibody titer in EBV-GC patients was significantly higher among men than among women, whereas EBV-negative GC cases did not show such a sex difference. A higher frequency of human leucocyte antigen-DR11 in EBV-GCs suggests that major histocompatibility complex-restricted EBV nuclear antigen 1 epitope recognition may enhance EBV reactivation. EBV infection of gastric cells by lymphocytes with reactivated EBV is suspected to be the first step of EBV-GC development. Male predominance of EBV-GC suggests the involvement of lifestyles and occupational factors common among men. The predominance of EBV with XhoI+ and BamHI type i polymorphisms in EBV-GC in Latin America suggests a possibility of some EBV oncogene expressions being affected by EBV polymorphism. The lack of such predominance in Asian countries, however, indicates an interaction between EBV polymorphism and the host response. In conclusion, further studies are necessary to examine the interaction between EBV infection, its polymorphisms, environmental factors, and genetic backgrounds. (Cancer Sci 2008; 99: 195-201)