In AMI patients with diabetes, A/C glycemic ratio is a better predictor of in-hospital morbidity and mortality than glycemia at admission.

No abstract

BackgroundIn acute myocardial infarction, acute hyperglycemia is a predictor of acute kidney injury (AKI), particularly in patients without diabetes mellitus. This emphasizes the importance of an acute glycemic rise rather than glycemia level at admission. We investigated whether, in diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction, the combined evaluation of acute and chronic glycemic levels may have better prognostic value for AKI than admission glycemia.Methods and ResultsAt admission, we prospectively measured glycemia and estimated average chronic glucose levels (mg/dL) using glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), according to the following formula: 28.7×HbA1c (%)−46.7. We evaluated the association with AKI of the acute/chronic glycemic ratio and of the difference between acute and chronic glycemia (ΔA−C). We enrolled 474 diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction. Of them, 77 (16%) experienced AKI. The incidence of AKI increased in parallel with the acute/chronic glycemic ratio (12%, 14%, 22%; P=0.02 for trend) and ΔA−C (13%, 13%, 23%; P=0.01) but not with admission glycemic tertiles (P=0.22). At receiver operating characteristic analysis, the acute/chronic glycemic ratio (area under the curve: 0.62 [95% confidence interval, 0.55–0.69]; P=0.001) and ΔA−C (area under the curve: 0.62 [95% confidence interval, 0.54–0.69]; P=0.002) accurately predicted AKI, without difference in the area under the curve between them (P=0.53). At reclassification analysis, the addition of the acute/chronic glycemic ratio and ΔA−C to acute glycemia allowed proper AKI risk prediction in 16% of patients.ConclusionsIn diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction, AKI is better predicted by the combined evaluation of acute and chronic glycemic values than by assessment of admission glycemia alone.

We found a significantly higher prevalence of nodular thyroid disease in patients with Cushing's disease with respect to a group of controls in whom the prevalence of thyroid nodules was comparable to that reported for the general population in Europe. The possibility that glucocorticoid excess is responsible for the development of thyroid changes does not seem likely since in our small series of patients with adrenal tumours the prevalence was only slightly higher than that observed in control subjects. Other factors related to hyperactivity of the corticotrophic cell, or a growth factor stimulating both corticotroph and thyrocyte proliferation might be involved. Evaluation of a larger series of patients with adrenal tumours may help to distinguish between these possibilities.