Background: Exercise-based rehabilitation is already a part of cystic fibrosis (CF) treatment; however, patient adherence is low. Objectives: To assess the effectiveness of a home exercise programme using active video games (AVGs) as a training modality for children and adolescents with CF. Methods: Thirty-nine children with CF were randomised to a control group (CG, n = 20, age 11 ± 6 years; FEV1 86.2 ± 20.5% of predicted) or a training group (AVGG, n = 19, age 13 ± 3 years; FEV1 82.7 ± 21.7% of predicted). The home training protocol consisted of 30- to 60-min sessions, 5 days/week, for 6 weeks using a Nintendo Wii™ platform. Exercise capacity was measured by the 6-min walk test (6MWT) and modified shuttle walk test (MSWT); muscular strength was estimated using the horizontal jump test (HJT), medicine ball throw (MBT), and hand grip strength (right [RHG]; left [LHG]); and quality of life was rated using the Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised (CFQ-R). All the children were measured at baseline, after rehabilitation, and at 12 months. Results: For the group × time interaction ANOVAs, the AVGG showed significant between-group differences in exercise capacity: 6MWT farthest walking distance, 38.4 m (p < 0.01); MSWT farthest walking distance, 78.4 m (p < 0.05); and muscular strength: HJT 9.8 cm, MBT 30.8 cm, RHG 7 kg, and LHG 6.5 kg (p < 0.01), before versus after intervention. The CFQ-R reported significantly higher scores on respiratory symptoms after the intervention and favoured the AVGG, and there was an improvement in other domains after 12 months. Adherence to the home exercise programme was 95% during the 6- week intervention period. Conclusion: A home-based programme using AVGs can effectively improve exercise capacity, muscular strength and quality of life in the short-term in children and adolescents with CF. The effects of training on muscle performance and quality of life were sustained over 12 months.
BACKGROUND: Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation (MI-E) is a noninvasive technique performed to simulate cough and remove sputum from proximal airways. To date, the effects of MI-E on critically ill patients on invasive mechanical ventilation are not fully elucidated. In this randomized crossover trial, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of MI-E combined to expiratory rib cage compressions (ERCC). METHODS: Twenty-six consecutive subjects who were sedated, intubated, and on mechanical ventilation > 48 h were randomized to perform 2 sessions of ERCC with or without additional MI-E before tracheal suctioning in a 24-h period. The primary outcome was sputum volume following each procedure. Secondary end points included effects on respiratory mechanics, hemodynamics, and safety. RESULTS: In comparison to ERCC alone, median (interquartile range) sputum volume cleared was significantly higher during ERCC+MI-E (0.42 [0-1.39] mL vs 2.29 [1-4.67] mL, P < .001). The mean 6 SD respiratory compliance improved in both groups immediately after the treatment, with the greater improvement in the ERCC+MI-E group (54.7 6 24.1 mL/cm H 2 O vs 73.7 6 35.8 mL/cm H 2 O, P < .001). Differences between the groups were not significant (P 5 .057). Heart rate increased significantly in both groups immediately after each intervention (P < .05). Additionally, a significant increase in oxygenation was observed from baseline to 1 h post-intervention in the ERCC+MI-E group (P < .05). Finally, several transitory hemodynamic variations occurred during both interventions, but these were nonsignificant and were considered clinically irrelevant. CONCLUSIONS: In mechanically ventilated subjects, MI-E combined with ERCC increased the sputum volume cleared without causing clinically important hemodynamic changes or adverse events. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT03316079.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.