A wide variety of food products, with emphasis on raw meat products, were analyzed simultaneously by 3 methods: the Assurance Escherichia coli 0157:H7 (EHEC) enzyme immunosorbent assay (EIA), the EHEC visual immunoprecipitate assay (VIP), and a modified Bacteriological Analytical Manual (BAM) culture method. This paper reports results of a comparative study of the Assurance and modified BAM methods. In this comparative study, 1050 samples and controls gave false-negative rates of 1.0 and 0%, respectively, for the Assurance EIA and the modified BAM culture methods. The overall agreement between the 2 methods was 99.4%. Cultural confirmation of presumptive positive samples was problematic because competitive flora were present in higher levels than EHEC in the enrichment broth after incubation and the target organism had nondescript characteristics on the primary selective agar, hemorrhagic coli agar, which necessitated picking of additional colonies in many instances.

Six foods representing a variety of food products were analyzed by the Assurance Listeria polyclonal enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and by either the Bacteriological Analytical Manual or the U.S. Department of Agriculture culture method for detecting Listeria monocytogenes and related Listeria species. Samples of each food type, at each inoculation level, were analyzed simultaneously by both methods. A total of 19 laboratories representing federal government agencies and private industry in the United States and Canada participated. Food types were inoculated with Listeria species including L. monocytogenes, with the exception of 3 lots of green beans, which were naturally contaminated. During this study, 1764 samples and controls were analyzed and confirmed, of which 492 were positive and 947 were negative by both methods. There were 159 samples that were positive by culture method but negative by the EIA and 188 that were negative by culture method but positive by EIA. Twenty-two samples were negative by EIA and by culture method but confirmed positive when Assurance selective enrichment broths were subcultured to selective agar. The Assurance polyclonal EIA for detecting L. monocytogenes and related Listeria species in foods has been adopted first action by AOAC INTERNATIONAL.

Six foods representing a variety of food products were analyzed by the Assurance Listeria polyclonal enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and by either the Bacteriological Analytical Manual or the U.S. Department of Agriculture culture method for detecting Listeria monocytogenes and related Listeria species. Samples of each food type, at each inoculation level, were analyzed simultaneously by both methods. A total of 19 laboratories representing federal government agencies and private industry in the United States and Canada participated. Food types were inoculated with Listeria species including L. monocytogenes, with the exception of 3 lots of green beans, which were naturally contaminated. During this study, 1764 samples and controls were analyzed and confirmed, of which 492 were positive and 947 were negative by both methods. There were 159 samples that were positive by culture method but negative by the EIA and 188 that were negative by culture method but positive by EIA. Twenty-two samples were negative by EIA and by culture method but confirmed positive when Assurance selective enrichment broths were subcultured to selective agar. The Assurance polyclonal EIA for detecting L. monocytogenes and related Listeria species in foods has been adopted first action by AOAC INTERNATIONAL.

Five foods types were analyzed by the Assurance EHEC (Escherichia coli 0157:H7) enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and by the Bacteriological Analytical Manual (BAM) culture method. Each sample of each food type at each inoculation level was simultaneously analyzed by both methods. A total of 21 laboratories representing state and federal government agencies and private industry in the United States and Canada participated. Samples were inoculated with E. coli 0157:H7, except for one lot of poultry that was naturally contaminated. A total of 1304 samples and controls were analyzed and confirmed, of which 473 were positive and 818 were negative by both methods. Thirteen samples were positive by BAM but negative by EIA. Because of the study design, it was not possible for the BAM method to produce false-negative or falsepositive results. The Assurance method for detection of E. coli OI57:H7 in selected foods has been adopted first action by AOAC INTERNATIONAL.

A wide variety of food products, with emphasis on raw meat products, were analyzed simultaneously by 3 methods: the Assurance Escherichia coli 0157:H7 (EHEC) enzyme immunosorbent assay (EIA), the EHEC visual immunoprecipitate assay (VIP), and a modified Bacteriological Analytical Manual (BAM) culture method. This paper reports results of a comparative study of the Assurance and modified BAM methods. In this comparative study, 1050 samples and controls gave false-negative rates of 1.0 and 0%, respectively, for the Assurance EIA and the modified BAM culture methods. The overall agreement between the 2 methods was 99.4%. Cultural confirmation of presumptive positive samples was problematic because competitive flora were present in higher levels than EHEC in the enrichment broth after incubation and the target organism had nondescript characteristics on the primary selective agar, hemorrhagic coli agar, which necessitated picking of additional colonies in many instances.