No abstract

Plasma viral burden has proven valuable in predicting the future course of systemic HIV related disease and the response to treatment. It is not known whether plasma or cerebrospinal¯uid (CSF) viral burden can be used to predict onset of or response to treatment of nervous system disease. We propose a model of viral load mediated neurotoxicity underlying peripheral and central HIV associated neurological disease. The objective of this preliminary study was to assess the relationship of HIV associated neurological disease to quantitative viral load in plasma and CSF. 47 subjects (HIV7=10, HIV+=37) participated in the study. Plasma and CSF samples were collected within a 3 h window. RT ± PCR (Roche Amplicor Monitor) was utilized to assess HIV-1 RNA viral load in both plasma and cell free (centrifuged) CSF. Subjects underwent concurrent comprehensive neurological and neuropsychological evaluations. In general, systemic viral load, as measured in plasma, was greater than that found in cell free CSF. Cell free CSF HIV RNA viral load was signi®cantly correlated with neurological dysfunction, whereas plasma viral load was not. The sole subject with an elevated CSF viral load (45 Log 10), had HIV associated dementia (HAD) on clinical examination.

Little information is available describing viral loads in body fluids other than blood. In addition, the suitability of commercially available assays for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) RNA quantitation has not been evaluated in most nonblood fluids. We compared Organon Teknika's nucleic acid sequence-based amplification method (NASBA) and Roche's Amplicor HIV-1 Monitor (reverse transcriptase PCR [RT-PCR]) for quantitating HIV-1 RNA in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), saliva, breast milk, seminal plasma, and cervical-vaginal lavage fluid (CVL). Saliva and breast milk frequently demonstrated some inhibition in the RT-PCR assay, similar to the inhibition previously described in seminal plasma. Inhibition of the RT-PCR assay was not observed with CSF or CVL, nor in any of the NASBA assays. When fluids from HIV-infected individuals were tested by RT-PCR and NASBA, 73 and 27% of CSF samples and 60 and 40% of breast milk specimens had detectable RNA, respectively. These differences were not statistically significant. In cross-sectional studies using RT-PCR to measure viral RNA in paired blood plasma and CSF samples, 71% of blood plasma samples and 42% of CSF samples were positive. A similar analysis using NASBA with paired blood plasma and CVL, saliva, or seminal plasma samples revealed 91% were blood plasma positive and 55% were CVL positive, 76% were blood plasma positive and 46% were saliva positive, and 83% were blood plasma positive and 63% were seminal plasma positive. NASBA worked fairly well to quantitate HIV-1 RNA from all fluids without apparent inhibition. RT-PCR performed well on CVL and CSF, frequently with greater sensitivity, although its use in other fluids appears limited due to the presence of inhibitors. These studies demonstrate that viral loads in nonblood fluids were generally lower than in blood.

E1B-55K-mutant or E4orf6-mutant adenoviruses replicate more effectively after infecting cells in S phase than after infecting cells in G1. Enhanced S-phase replication of the E4orf6-mutant viruses requires the E4orf3 gene. This report demonstrates that the E4orf3 gene is also required for enhanced S-phase replication of the E1B-55K-mutant virus

We compared the performance of Organon Teknika’s NucliSens and Roche Diagnostic Systems’ Monitor quantitative human immunodeficiency type 1 RNA assays. Both had similar linearity and sensitivity over most of the dynamic range of the assays, although the Monitor assay was superior at the low range of RNA values while the NucliSens assay was more consistent at higher RNA values. NucliSens generally showed less interassay variability.