Aims This study aims to quantify the diagnostic test-accuracy of three visual function self-monitoring tests for detection of active disease in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) when compared with usual care. An integrated qualitative study will investigate the acceptability of these home-based testing strategies. Methods All consenting participants are provided with an equipment pack containing an iPod touch with two vision test applications installed and a paper journal of reading tests. Participants self-monitor their vision at home each week with all three tests for 12-18 months. Usual care continues over this period. Key eligibility criteria are: age ≥50 years; at least one eye with AMD with ≥6-≤42 months since first AMD treatment; and vision not worse than Snellen 6/60, LogMAR 1.04 or 33 letters. The primary outcome, and reference standard, is diagnosis of active disease during usual care monitoring in the Hospital Eye Service. Secondary outcomes include duration of study participation, ability of participants to do the tests, adherence to weekly testing and acceptability of the tests to participants. Conclusions Recruitment is in progress at five NHS centres. Challenges in procuring equipment, setting up the devices and transporting devices containing lithium batteries to participating sites delayed the start of recruitment. The study will describe the performance of the tests self-administered at home in detecting active disease compared to usual care monitoring. It will also describe the feasibility of the NHS implementing patient-administered electronic tests or similar applications at home for monitoring health. Study registration ISRCTN identifier: 79058224.
Mounting preclinical evidence has implicated the NLRP3 inflammasome in depression-related behaviours elicited by chronic stress or acute lipopolysaccharide (LPS) challenge. However, the relevance of acute LPS as a model of depression has been questioned and behavioural time-courses of its effects can be inconsistent. The aims of this study were (1) to develop a novel protocol for repeated daily LPS administration and (2) to use this model to assess the involvement of NLRP3 inflammasome signalling in sustained inflammation-induced depressive-like behaviour in adult C57BL/6J mice deficient in NLRP3. Acute LPS (0.83mg/kg; i.p.) induced sickness behaviour evident as hypolocomotor activity. However, there was no significant increase in depressive-like behaviour in the forced swim test 24h post-administration. Interestingly, depressive-like behaviours were observed in the female urine sniffing test and in the sucrose preference test at 24h, but not 48h, post-administration of acute LPS. To mimic a period of sustained inflammation, 3-day repeated increasing LPS doses (0.1, 0.42 and 0.83mg/kg; i.p.) was compared to constant LPS doses (0.83mg/kg; i.p.). Sickness behaviour was seen in response to increasing doses, but tolerance developed to repeated constant doses of LPS. Furthermore, 3-day increasing doses of LPS resulted in a significant increase in immobility time in the forced swim test, consistent with depressive-like behaviour. When NLRP3 mice received this 3-day increasing dose regimen of LPS, sickness behaviours were attenuated compared to wild-type mice. The behaviour in the forced swim test was not significantly altered in NLRP3 mice. We propose that this increasing repeated dosing LPS model of inflammation-induced depressive-like behaviour may better model the sustained inflammation observed in depression and may provide a more translationally relevant paradigm to study the inflammatory mechanisms that contribute to depression.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.