Ecologists have advocated retaining various densities of canopy trees in harvest units in Pacific Northwest forests. In contrast to clear‐cutting, this practice may better emulate the patterns of disturbance and structural complexity typical of natural forests in the region. Several ecological attributes, including vertebrate habitat diversity, are thought to be associated with stands of complex structure. The goal of this study was to determine bird abundance in canopy retention sites relative to other common stand types in the Pacific Northwest and to develop habitat functions for extrapolating bird abundance across current and future landscapes. We used data from five previous studies in the west central Cascades of Oregon to compare bird abundance and to develop habitat functions for forest birds across a wide range of natural and managed stand structures and ages. The 67 stands included clearcuts, retention sites, young closed‐canopy plantations, mature stands, and old‐growth stands. ANOVA revealed that 18 of the 23 species included in the analysis differed significantly in abundance among the stand types, with some species being primarily associated with each of the stand types. The habitat variables used to build habitat functions included tree density by size class, mean tree diameter, and variation in tree diameter. Linear, polynomial, and various nonlinear regression models were evaluated for each bird species. Significant habitat functions were generated for 17 of the 23 bird species. The analyses identified four habitat‐use guilds among the 17 bird species: open‐canopy; open‐canopy with dispersed large trees; structurally complex closed‐canopy; and structurally simple closed‐canopy guilds. This study is the first in the Pacific Northwest to compare bird abundances across natural stands, traditionally managed plantations, and stands managed under ecological forestry approaches. The results suggested that canopy tree retention benefits many, but not all, of the bird species we studied, Moreover, the nonlinear responses of bird abundance revealed thresholds in tree density at which bird abundance changed dramatically. Knowledge of these thresholds allow managers to design stands for specific biodiversity objectives. The habitat functions presented here can be used to predict bird abundance based on habitat measurements derived from field data, remotely sensed data, or output from computer models of forest dynamics.

No abstract