In this paper, the dynamics of a bouncing ball is described for several common ball types having different bounce characteristics. Results are presented for a tennis ball, a baseball, a golf ball, a superball, a steel ball bearing, a plasticene ball, and a silly putty ball. The plasticene ball was studied as an extreme case of a ball with a low coefficient of restitution ͑in fact zero, since the collision is totally inelastic͒ and the silly putty ball was studied because it has unusual elastic properties. The first three balls were studied because of their significance in the physics of sports. For each ball, a dynamic hysteresis curve is presented to show how energy is lost during and after the collision. The measurement technique is quite simple, it is suited for undergraduate laboratory experiments, and it may provide a useful method to test and approve balls for major sporting events.

Measurements of the normal reaction force and the friction force acting on an obliquely bouncing ball were made to determine whether the friction force acting on the ball is due to sliding, rolling, or static friction. At low angles of incidence to the horizontal, a ball incident without spin will slide throughout the bounce. At higher angles of incidence, elementary bounce models predict that the ball will start to slide, but will then commence to roll if the point of contact on the circumference of the ball momentarily comes to rest on the surface. Measurements of the friction force and ball spin show that real balls do not roll when they bounce. Instead, the deformation of the contact region allows a ball to grip the surface when the bottom of the ball comes to rest on the surface. As a result the ball vibrates in the horizontal direction causing the friction force to reverse direction during the bounce. The spin of the ball was found to be larger than that due to the friction force alone, a result that can be explained if the normal reaction force acts vertically through a point behind the center of the ball.

When a ball is incident obliquely on a flat surface, the rebound spin, speed, and angle generally differ from the corresponding incident values. Measurements of all three quantities were made using a digital video camera to film the bounce of a tennis ball incident with zero spin at various angles on several different surfaces. The maximum spin rate of a spherical ball is determined by the condition that the ball commences to roll at the end of the impact. Under some conditions, the ball was found to spin faster than this limit. This result can be explained if the ball or the surface stores energy elastically due to deformation in a direction parallel to the surface. The latter effect was investigated by comparing the bounce of a tennis ball with that of a superball. Ideally, the coefficient of restitution (COR) of a superball is 1.0 in both the vertical and horizontal directions. The COR for the superball studied was found to be 0.76 in the horizontal direction, and the corresponding COR for a tennis ball was found to vary from −0.51 to +0.24 depending on the incident angle and the coefficient of sliding friction.

Measurements are presented on the coefficient of rolling friction for steel balls rolling on hard surfaces. Two simple techniques are described, both suitable for use in a student laboratory, and both capable of measuring friction coefficients as small as 0.0001. The coefficient of rolling friction depends strongly on ball radius, an effect first observed by Coulomb in 1785. In this work, the dependence on ball radius is found to be similar to that observed by Tabor in 1955 using steel balls on rubber and on soft metal surfaces. However, it is found that rolling friction on a hard surface is due primarily to surface roughness rather than the hysteresis losses commonly associated with soft balls or soft surfaces. It is also found that the coefficient of rolling friction is approximately proportional to rolling speed.

Details are given of an inexpensive force plate designed to measure ground reaction forces involved in human movement. Such measurements provide interesting demonstrations of relations between displacement, velocity, and acceleration, and illustrate aspects of mechanics that are not normally encountered in a conventional mechanics course, or that are more commonly associated with inanimate objects. When walking, the center of mass follows a curved path. The centripetal force is easily measured and it provides an upper limit to the speed at which a person can walk. When running, the legs behave like simple springs and the center of mass follows a path that is the same as that of a perfectly elastic bouncing ball.