We prove the existence of a large complete subgraph w.h.p. in a preferential attachment random graph process with an edge-step. That is, we consider a dynamic stochastic process for constructing a graph in which at each step we independently decide, with probability p ∈ (0, 1), whether the graph receives a new vertex or a new edge between existing vertices. The connections are then made according to a preferential attachment rule. We prove that the random graph G t produced by this so-called GLP (Generalized linear preferential) model at time t contains a complete subgraph whose vertex set cardinality is given by t α , where α = (1 − ε) 1−p 2−p , for any small ε > 0 asymptotically almost surely.
In this work we investigate a preferential attachment model whose parameter is a function f : N → [0, 1] that drives the asymptotic proportion between the numbers of vertices and edges of the graph. We investigate topological features of the graphs, proving general bounds for the diameter and the clique number. Our results regarding the diameter are sharp when f is a regularly varying function at infinity with strictly negative index of regular variation −γ. For this particular class, we prove a characterization for the diameter that depends only on −γ. More specifically, we prove that the diameter of such graphs is of order 1/γ with high probability, although its vertex set order goes to infinity polynomially. Sharp results for the diameter for a wide class of slowly varying functions are also obtained. The almost sure convergence for the properly normalized logarithm of the clique number of the graphs generated by slowly varying functions is also proved.
In this paper, we investigate the global clustering coefficient (a.k.a transitivity) and clique number of graphs generated by a preferential attachment random graph model with an additional feature of allowing edge connections between existing vertices. Specifically, at each time step t, either a new vertex is added with probability f (t), or an edge is added between two existing vertices with probability 1 − f (t). We establish concentration inequalities for the global clustering and clique number of the resulting graphs under the assumption that f (t) is a regularly varying function at infinity with index of regular variation −γ, where γ ∈ [0, 1). We also demonstrate an inverse relation between these two statistics: the clique number is essentially the reciprocal of the global clustering coefficient.
In this work we investigate a bootstrap percolation process on random graphs generated by a random graph model which combines preferential attachment and edge insertion between previously existing vertices. The probabilities of adding either a new vertex or a new connection between previously added vertices are time dependent and given by a function f called the edge-step function. We show that under integrability conditions over the edge-step function the graphs are highly susceptible to the spread of infections, which requires only 3 steps to infect a positive fraction of the whole graph. To prove this result, we rely on a quantitative lower bound for the maximum degree that might be of independent interest.
The Holme-Kim random graph processes is a variant of the Barabási-Álbert scale-free graph that was designed to exhibit clustering. In this paper we show that whether the model does indeed exhibit clustering depends on how we define the clustering coefficient. In fact, we find that local clustering coefficient remains typically positive whereas global clustering tends to 0 at a slow rate. These and other results are proven via martingale techniques, such as Freedman's concentration inequality combined with a bootstrapping argument.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.