Pediatric cardiologists may have frequent contact with children with FASD and increased levels of attention to prenatal alcohol exposure as a potential etiology of CHD is indicated.
Background Optimal initial treatment for congenital aortic valve stenosis in children remains unclear between balloon aortic valvuloplasty ( BAV ) and surgical aortic valvotomy ( SAV ). Methods and Results We performed a contemporary systematic review and meta‐analysis to compare survival in children with congenital aortic valve stenosis. Secondary outcomes included frequency of at least moderate regurgitation at hospital discharge as well as rates of aortic valve replacement and reintervention. Single‐ and dual‐arm studies were identified by a search of PubMed (Medline), Embase, and the Cochrane database. Overall 2368 patients from 20 studies were included in the analysis, including 1835 (77%) in the BAV group and 533 (23%) in the SAV group. There was no difference between SAV and BAV in hospital mortality ( OR =0.98, 95% CI 0.5–2.0, P =0.27, I 2 =22%) or frequency of at least moderate aortic regurgitation at discharge ( OR =0.58, 95% CI 0.3–1.3, P =0.09, I 2 =54%). Kaplan–Meier analysis showed no difference in long‐term survival or freedom from aortic valve replacement but significantly more reintervention in the BAV group (10‐year freedom from reintervention of 46% [95% CI 40–52] for BAV versus 73% [95% CI 68–77] for SAV , P <0.001). Results were unchanged in a sensitivity analysis restricted to infants (<1 year of age). Conclusions Although higher rates of reintervention suggest improved outcomes with SAV , indications for reintervention may vary depending on initial intervention. When considering the benefits of a less‐invasive approach, and clinical equipoise with respect to more clinically relevant outcomes, these findings support the need for a randomized controlled trial.
BACKGROUND In the care of patients with congenital heart disease, percutaneous interventional treatments have supplanted many surgical approaches for simple lesions, such as atrial septal defect. By contrast, complex congenital heart defects continue to require open-heart surgery. In single-ventricle patients, a staged approach is employed, which requires multiple open-heart surgeries and significant attendant morbidity and mortality. A nonsurgical transcatheter alternative would be attractive. OBJECTIVES We sought to show the feasibility of catheter-only, closed-chest, large-vessel anastomosis (superior vena cava and pulmonary artery [PA] or bidirectional Glenn operation equivalent) in a patient. METHODS In preclinical testing over a decade, we developed the techniques and technology needed for nonsurgical crossing from a donor (superior vena cava) to a recipient (PA) vessel and endovascular stent-based anastomosis of those blood vessels. We undertook this transcatheter approach for an adult with untreated congenital heart disease with severe cyanosis and significant surgical risk. We rehearsed the procedure step by step using contrast-enhanced cardiac computed tomography and a patient-specific 3-dimensional printed heart model. RESULTS We described a first-in-human, fully percutaneous superior cavopulmonary anastomosis (bidirectional Glenn operation equivalent). The patient, a 35-year-old woman, was homebound due to dyspnea and worsening cyanosis. She was diagnosed with functional single ventricle and very limited pulmonary blood flow. The heart team believed surgical palliation conferred high operative risk due to the patient’s complete condition. With the percutaneous procedure, the patient suffered little morbidity and remained improved clinically after 6 months. CONCLUSIONS This procedure may provide a viable alternative to one of the foundational open-heart surgeries currently performed to treat single-ventricle congenital heart disease.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.