This article describes an experiment in the assessment of composition by group consensus. It was designed to prove that small groups of assessors confronted with only aural evidence of particular compositions could, when using suitable criteria, under certain working conditions, come to similar enough judgements on these compositions to prove the method reliable. The method itself was based on the sessions in assessment held at the University of York in 1977 under the chairmanship of Robert Bunting, but, whereas the results in the York session were quite promising and pointed to the reliability of this method, the present experiment has exposed great flaws in a procedure that is advocated by at least one G.C.S.E. group as being suitable for the moderation of students' compositions.
The Rita gas field was the first dual lateral well aimed at carboniferous reservoirs drilled in the UK Southern North Sea. This method enabled both the East and West fault segments of the field to be produced from the same upper well bore, thus reducing drilling costs and improving field economics. An invert emulsion drilling fluid was chosen for this field application due to the risk of shale instability over the long horizontal sections of each wellbore. The West segment was drilled and suspended with a whipstock placed above the sand screen completion. The positioning of this whipstock would not allow for re-entry, making remediation of the West lateral impractical. A remediation treatment for this leg was required as the planned suspension fluid was an invert emulsion system that would be in contact with the completion screens and reservoir for more than a month whilst the East leg was drilled and completed. The chosen suspension fluid in the East leg removed the requirement for remediation with enhanced well productivity. This paper describes the design and testing of the reservoir drilling and suspension/completion fluids that were used on this multi-lateral project to minimise drilling time and maximise productivity. Introduction The well described in this paper was a complicated design and consisted of a dual lateral to produce gas from two unconnected reservoirs. The Rita well (44/22–12) was spudded in early July 2008. The first (West) leg of the well had a TD of over 17,000 ft with a 6" horizontal section of over 2,700 ft. After the lower completion was run in the first leg a whipstock was set to enable drilling of the second (East) leg. The East leg had a TD of 15,600 ft and a 6" horizontal section of over 2000 ft. The plan was to suspend the first leg for a period of time that might exceed 2 months to allow for the drilling of the second leg and the running and installing the novel completion. This industry has experienced lower than expected production rates from wells which have been suspended for long periods with oil-based, solids-laden fluids before a clean up has been initiated. This raised the question of what type of fluid to leave below the whipstock, as re-entry to this leg for clean-up or well remediation was not economically feasible if production was lower than expected. Due to the diametrically opposed shape of the well, with long horizontal sections the drilling team was strongly in favour of using an oil-based reservoir drill in fluid (OBRDIF). This fluid would give a stable wellbore and provide a low friction co-efficient for drilling and running the completion assemblies. Using OBRDIF would reduce the risk of hole instability and minimise non-productive time. However if OBRDIF was used in the drilling phase, it would mean that a solids-laden invert emulsion would be left in the hole when the first leg was suspended with the sand screens below the whipstock. This presented several risks. The fluid would require fine screening to prevent blocking of the completion equipment with drill solids. Also, there was a risk that the solid particles in the suspension fluid would agglomerate as the fluid remained static for an extended period. If agglomeration did occur, these solids would probably not pass through the mesh of the completion screens and could potentially reduce their conductance. The size and concentration of the solids in the suspension fluid were recognised as areas of concern that should be addressed to ensure maximum productivity of this well.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.